Glass House Presents

A hodgepodge collection of friendship and camaraderie...

 

The Official Site of the

GEORGE REEVES Hall of Fame

 

Sunday, July 06, 2008


GHP Home

Hall of Fame

All About Us

TAOS Bloopers

Noel Neill

Schutz Board

Carl's Corner

Jan's Angle

Bruce Dettman

Cliffhangers

The X Factor

Steven Kirk

Eddie Caro

Dark Angel

Colete's View

Alfred Walker

GHP Alumni

Special Features

TAC

Mike Curtis

Just Say Sue!

Gail's Diner

John Raspanti

Books/Review

Lou Koza

Fred Crane

Richard Potter

Brad Wilson

Randy Garrett

Braggin' Writes

GR Tour 2005

Lone Pine 2005

Noel's Birthday Bash

Destiny's Choice

Fiji 2006

Links

GHP Home

 

 

Come meet our friend, Eddie Caro.

Eddie is a Super Hero Fan...

Born on September 25, the same day as Christopher Reeve, but twelve years later.  Was introduced to Superman while at my grandmother’s house. I saw the Adventures of Superman for the very first time and have been hooked ever since. I enjoyed the first two Superman movies starring Christopher Reeve, but George Reeves will always be Superman to me.

I am fortunate enough to meet fellow Superman fans and share insights about a show that made an impact on us all. I collect various comic books and other miscellaneous superhero items.  I enjoy reading and watching movies about other superheroes, but Superman will always be on the top of the list for me. I also want to say thanks to my wife Janet for giving me a room to put all my stuff in.

Eddie Caro's

Interviews and Articles


SAVING GEORGE REEVES

AN HISTORICAL & EDUCATIONAL

CD PRESENTATION

I recently purchased a CD that gives fans an historical and educational outlook of a man who later became our Superman. The CD is titled “Saving George Reeves,” which was done by noted George Reeves Historian Lou Koza. When you watch this presentation you can tell immediately that Lou spent hours upon countless hours of dedicated research on the life and time of a man whom many called “Honest George.”  If the old saying is “A picture is worth a thousand words,” Lou gives us an encyclopedia of information to devour, complete with newspaper articles and pictures from Lou’s personal collection detailing George’s movie and television career. When I first loaded my “Saving George Reeves” CD One & Two Consolidated Presentation, I knew I found someone who brought us his version of “Hollywoodland,” which is presented to us in a Power Point Presentation that includes over 225 slides.  After viewing this documentary, I presented Lou some questions in regards to his fact-finding CD.

EC-When was the first time you saw George Reeves and what did he do for you to become such a loyal fan?

LK- The first time I saw George was of course on the Superman TV show, sometime around 1960-61, WPIX channel 11 in the Metropolitan New York area. It didn’t register to me what his name was, he just seemed like a really neat person. He made you feel like you were his good friend. After watching a couple of episodes, I did want to know who he was. I remember asking my father his name and he said “George Reeves.” The words that followed had an unfamiliar meaning, which had a mysterious tone to it. I was five years old and it was probably the first time I’d heard of death. I never really found out how my father knew who George was. Years later, after my own father passed away, did I make the connection that they both served in the Army Air Corp. My Dad must have seen George in one of those government films. Anyway, unlike so many other fans of the show I never really had that feeling “of Superman patrolling the skies” to keep me safe nor was in awe that I was seeing the real Superman. I did, like so many others, run around the house with a towel around my neck. In one visit to my Aunt’s house, I remember trying to get her to tuck the towel into my shirt neck opening like George’s, not tied around my neck with a knot in the front. So, she employed safety pins to secure it into place. LOL. Once I connected a name to this man, to me the real identity of this person was George Reeves. And from reading the comic books George Reeves’ name was not included in the stories. So, I knew there was a big difference between the two. However, being there was a live version of Superman, he was in my mind (in comparison to the comic books) the closest we would see a Superman.  This is just my opinion. There have been great actors that played Superman, but George remains at the top. I admired the Superman in the comic books, then most notably drawn by Curt Swan. But the two were logistically different, but similar in some hinted ways. Of the two versions, George Reeves won the part.

EC-When did you start doing research on George Reeves to find out everything about him?

LK- Research to me is defined by going out and talking to the people involved. Like visiting places and discovering something unknown or maybe confirming an issue. I was always searching for old newspapers and articles to piece together facts about a life I wanted to know more about. Then there’s learning which, is information obtained from the research of others. Such as reading Gary Grossman’s book, Superman: Serial to Cereal. A great title by the way. Learning new things from Jan Alan Henderson’s Speeding Bullet: The Life and Bizarre Death of George Reeves. Gosh, the Merrill Sparks insight was a real eye opener. Why didn’t he come forward on June 17, 1959? I guess we will never know.

I’ve spoken to Jack Larson, Noel Neill, Robert Rockwell, Dabbs Greer, Jeff Corey, Keith Thibodeaux, and Joanne Siegel, the wife of Jerry Siegel co-creator of the Superman character. I’ve walked away with various bits of knowledge from each of them. In doing so, I got to understand George Reeves the person, a little better with each conversation. I’ve also been inside the house that was once occupied by George. I discovered the correct location of the master bedroom. In all the writings and TV segments to that point, it never made sense to me as it was described above the garage and finally I was able to satisfy my own curiosity (it’s above the living room).  As a result I made it highly known to everyone interested what was correct. I eventually created a layout of the house for the TAC site to help satisfy the extremely curious fan base and give future authors and producers a reference.

In addition, a number of times I went to college libraries, other than the ones I attended and found they had years and years of newspapers saved on microfiche. I gathered a lot of articles relative to George’s untimely death. As a result of gathering this information. I’ve been able to step back in time to read first hand the chain of events as it occurred. Now while not everything you read is the truth, it takes a lot of time cross-referencing with folks with this interest to sort out what is or isn’t logical. But just because something doesn’t seem logical, that doesn’t mean it’s not the truth. Truth comes in all forms.

EC-What made you decide to do “Saving George Reeves” and what was your intention while making it?

LK- It has really been about the fans getting as much on George as possible. I realized after several years of collecting and reading everything and anything published, I realized I had a lot of photos and articles that by 2002 were never before published. Initially, the material was meant for The Adventures Continue #17. Because of the Internet and less than moderate sales of #16, Jim had announced this would be the last issue. I hoped to convince him to do another. What I had to offer would have easily filled up an entire issue. When I showed a number of these items to Jim Nolt, he even took a moment to give it some consideration. By 2001, the TAC web site was now six or seven years old and many more people were turning to the Internet for their George Reeves and Superman interest. So with the TAC fanzine no longer a viable channel, I decided to do my own thing. While a book would be the ultimate tribute, I felt the quickest way to reach the fans was to create a presentation using the Power Point program. I also felt while it’s great to read about George’s life in various modern day biographies. I think the fans get more out of this interest by reading first hand those rare and hard to find articles that were used as resources. For example, we’ve read that George appeared in Winged Victory in 1943 and one or two points of information is told. Then I found this really extraordinary article titled G.I. Greasepaint which I felt the fans would love to read. It has a lot of information and wonderful photos with George and his wife Ellanora and their experience together in this Moss Hart production. I figured if I could gather a lot of what I thought was unique and make it available the fans would have a greater appreciation for the subject. Superman’s Girl Friday is another article which features Phyllis Coates. Many fans had heard of it, but not many have actually read this extensive article. Another wonderful article is Super Heart in its entirety. George visits Nati Vacio at his school. I’ve scanned entire pages, so the fans get to see it exactly as it was printed.  It’s satisfying to everyone interested. As a result, the collector doesn't have to do a long, exhausting search around the country any more.

EC-How long did it take for you to complete the “Saving George Reeves” CDs?

LK- Both CD presentations took about four months to complete. But remember, it took me years and years to collect all the material contained therein. Since the second CD presentation, I’ve been fortunate to obtain many more great items. Heck, 98% of my purchases on eBay are George Reeves related. As for a third CD, I have no plans to do another one. Like Jim’s assessment of issue 16 of TAC, it doesn’t lend itself to another go at it. I think what the readers are looking for is a book. I’d love to do one, and I have a great idea. I spoke to several people about it and they are absolutely excited by the idea. But again, there are no solid plans at this time nor am I pursuing a publisher. The CDs are like a sampler, speaking for themselves and if someone wants to partner up for a book, I’m listening.

EC-Now with the days of the internet finding photographs is somewhat easier. When you started collecting, how were you able to find some of these rare and hard-to-find photographs? Are these original movie stills?

LK- I started just asking around local memorabilia stores and collectable shows. My first four photos were of the following: Superman shaking hands with the police officer, Superman standing in the freezer (from The Big Freeze), Superman turning towards the camera with the cape bellowed out to the right and one of George Reeves accepting an award from a man. In the last photo, I described George is wearing a traditional dark suit. It’s obviously from the extreme late 50’s since he is wearing his prescription eyeglasses and his hair in thinning. The first three photos would soon turn out to be common, but they are original. Regarding the award photo, something told me I’d better not overlook this.  It turned out be a photo I’ve never seen again and therefore I feel very fortunate I made the right selection over a couple of others which I didn’t buy. I paid thirty dollars for each, which in 1984 was a lot of money. Considering what was available back then, it was very little so well worth it.

EC-Many of these photos are more personal pictures of George with family and friends. Were you surprised that some people were selling these items?

LK- Not really, because a lot of people want to make a couple of dollars or trade to improve their own collections. I’ll never obtain anything without a fair exchange. For the most part everyone I’ve come in contact with, have been great. Unfortunately, I did get hustled a couple of times in the past due to being good natured. But I have no regrets. You win some, you lose some.   Nowadays I'm safe-guarding more of my material to protect the overall collection for a mightier project.

EC-What do you consider some of the highlights that you presented on your “Saving George Reeves” CD?

LK- I'm very proud of an original The Monroe Doctrine photo. It's really a one-of-a-kind black and white photo, but the negative was hand tinted in color. The final result is a gorgeous color print. Also, I became familiar with George's other work outside of Superman from Gary's Superman: Serial to Cereal book. When I found the Monroe Doctrine photo, this kicked off my real interest. It made me realize there is a whole other side of George to explore, with so much more to learn. That's one of the benefits of the Saving George Reeves CD, it's packed with many wonderful photos of George both in and beyond Superman. I think it appeals to both those interested in his full career and as well as the Superman years. Personally, I don't limit myself to just the wonderful Superman years. If you feel there is magic in his Superman performances, you'll find the same beyond the red cape.  By the way, I found the Monroe Doctrine photo in a store on Hollywood Boulevard in June of 1991. It was the last store I went into after coming up empty with several others while looking for George-Superman photos. Someone must have came and cleaned that whole boulevard out! I’ve only seen it again when it appeared in Jan Alan Henderson and Steve Randisi’s book Behind the Crimson Cape in a black and white version.  I know Jan's actual photo is black and white. So what I have is unique.  Another highlight photo is George in the cast photo from Variety Girl. Believe it or not, I found this while searching through a vendor’s magazine box at an outside vintage car show in Pennsylvania. I try to leave no stone unturned, even in odd places like a car show. I also found an incredible 1942 magazine article on Jerry Siegel and Joe Shuster that day. The Variety Girl cast photo is probably the only known image of George known to exist from that film. Fans were hard-pressed to spot him in the film itself. I suspect he is at the end when many of the performers walk across the screen. He’s seen at best very faintly in the background.

There are so many highlights on the CDs it really is difficult to not discuss them all, but obviously this interview would take a lot longer!  When I released the CDs, 95% of the items were unique to anything published. Today it still holds up very well, though a little bit here and there has cropped up. I’m proud to present many of those extremely rare articles to give the fans hours of reading enjoyment. And again, the fan response has been great.

EC-I also see you go into detail with other actors/addresses that appeared with George in the movies and television. Did you also look into some of their movie careers?

LK- I thought it would be interesting to acknowledge whom George worked with. It's meant to keep it interesting. Regarding The Monroe Doctrine photo, there you'll find Nanette Fabray. It was only when I referred to imdb.com did it become aware she was the woman in the photo. I was really surprised and excited about it when I learned of it.  

EC-You included numerous articles from movies and newspapers about George Reeves from his early years. Even with the internet, I had a tough time finding the newspaper articles to read about George, especially at the time of his death. How were you able to obtain them?

LK- As I mentioned before, I found many of the newspaper articles on microfiche at a local college. Because the printing from these machines are very substandard, I retyped them word for word as they were originally printed. There are about twenty New York and Los Angeles articles to read in there. Since then I've come across a couple of originals. One I have is an entire June 24, 1959 Los Angeles newspaper with George and the unfortunate headline story. Many other magazine articles were from eBay purchases. I also found some through collectable shows and stores. It takes a lot of patience to go through boxes and boxes of magazines, but it is well worth it.  Then again going by the rule of not to leave any stone unturned, when you least expect it to happen something wonderful pops up. The thrill of the find is amazing. For example, there is an image of George with a little girl on his shoulders at the opening of Disneyland. It is a three by four inch photo, difficult to spot unless you look at each and every photo. There it stood alone in the celebrity’s tidbit section of the magazine. It’s great to find some of these treasures and share them with other fans. I’m still trying to nail down an image of George in a NY newspaper between August and September 1958.

EC-Were you amazed on how much work George did prior to playing the role of Clark Kent/Superman?

LK-When you look at his career on a whole, he really didn't do a lot of lounging around. He had a really good career. Remember he was in many Pasadena Playhouse stage shows, which kept him busy too, even during his theatrical years. Granted, his theatrical film work can't be compared to John Wayne's or Gary Grant's, but he had some marvelous performances throughout his career. So Proudly We Hail is one prime example. I want to mention that Claudette Colbert was searching through audition after audition for her leading man.  As she was sitting in the projection room and looked at screen tests of many young men, George’s audition was there by mistake. When Claudette saw his face, she shouted, “Stop, that’s the man!” This article is in the CD presentation. Soon Jungle Goddess and Thunder in the Pines will be released by Kit Parker. They aren't Academy Award films by any stretch, but fun films to watch. 

EC-What movies did you enjoy seeing him in?

LK-Always a Bride, Man At Large and BAR20 are big favorites. I'd love to see Kit get his hands on them for DVD release.  Always a Bride is just extraordinary. George out-besting John Eldredge for the loving hand of Priscilla Lane. It's a real hoot. George is at his charming best. I've said this before, I think George was one of the very best leading romance actors in the business. When he looked into a woman's eyes he never wandered off. She is his only interest. This could be a good lesson for the guys...it’s what women want. Oh, and interesting to note, Always a Bride was released sometime near the date George and Ellanora were married in December 1940.

EC-What was the most difficult task you had in trying to complete your project?

LK- I can’t say I had any. I pretty much knew what I wanted to do. I guess it was the grueling effort to retype the newspaper articles. Also, cleaning up some minor water stains from the vintage articles.

EC-When doing your research were you able to denounce a number of rumors that have been going around for years about George to be false?

LK- As a rule, I try not to speculate on any one issue unless I have two or three pieces of information that go with it. It was told Don Brewer had introduced himself to George backstage of Winged Victory in Chicago. This story probably started by someone after hearing only a small detail of the event and assuming how point A got to point B. George was rejected by Don Brewer in 1943 during Winged Victory.  While true on that level, the embellished meeting backstage is untrue. I found out George learned of his natural father while staying with a cousin. When George got to Chicago with Ellanora he phoned Don Brewer living in the Mid-West. During their conversation, Don rejected a relationship with George.  Based on what I learned, I speculated the logical reason was that Don did not want to rock the boat with his current wife, a headstrong woman, by introducing George into the family. My speculation was confirmed by a family member as accurate. George would have been 29 at the time and he was very disturbed by this moment. Gosh, who wouldn’t? 

Then again, we can't always believe everything we read. I have the article where it states George refers to his confrontation with the 8 year old boy aiming his fathers gun at him. We've come to learn that this was not true. But then again, we hear from other people writing on message boards that lived in the Detroit area that seem to recall hearing about this episode in 1954.

EC-Were there any other people who were able to assist you so you could give fans the most accurate information on George Reeves?

LK- I talk to people all the time. For years I have communicated with Jim Nolt, Randy Garrett, Jan Alan Henderson, and Steve Randisi. I have also spoken to Carl Glass. He is in catch-up mode, and making great progress, I will say. He has a great interest and boundless energy as we discuss George at great length. As a result of our conversations, we are exchanging information, thoughts and confirming details for each other. Deciphering what makes logical sense and what doesn’t, and does it hold any value? So I’m sure what we’ve learned from each other has made it into the CD presentations. Certainly just about everyone I know has recognition of inspiration somewhere in there.

EC-I noticed there were a lot of photographs contained in your CD, but there was also a few drawings done by Randy Garrett, illustrator for the Superman and the Secret Planet comic book (which can be seen at www.jimnolt.com).  Were any of these drawings his idea to add to your CD or yours?

LK- First let me say this, the world is a far better place with Randy Garrett in it. He has made so many people from all over the world happy with his rendition of Superman & the Secret Planet. I consider Randy one of my greatest friendships and I'm flat out his biggest fan, bar-none. That's a mighty tall statement considering how well admired he is by The Adventures of Superman community (LOL). He is an ace of a guy. His generosity is rarely matched. Just look at Superman & the Secret Planet and other work he has done on the TAC website.

The two illustrations Randy did for me were ideas of my own, inspired from something else. His skills as an illustrator can catch lightning in a bottle as far as I'm concerned. It’s amazing to have the talent to layout and pencil an illustration, but look close at the inking. His embellishes and colorings are just so wonderfully rendered. He is a complete craftsman.  He recreated the cover of Superman #16 with the likeness of Noel and George. This image has traveled around in my head ever since I laid eyes on that issue. (Which, by the way, I own an original copy.) The other image is of George revisiting the Mole Men in 1953. The image came to me when I saw the film Toy Story. Do you remember the scene where Buzz Lightyear falls into the game occupied by little green people? Right then, I saw George and the Mole Men. I gave Randy the idea and he did a tremendous job. Then again when doesn't he do a great job? The TAC web-site, 16 issues of the fanzine and the two calendars he and Jim produced are graced with tons of his wonderful illustrations. No one could have done what Randy unselfishly has done. He illustrated Noel and George in the Nash-Healy for me to perfection. I gave him a very rough sketch, a little written text detail of how I envisioned Noel and George and the imagination became a reality. As far as I'm concerned he is a great part of the extended history of the Adventures of Superman. You can’t give a history lesson on this show without including Randy’s Secret Planet.    

EC-Now that the movie “Hollywoodland” came out, do you think there will be new or renewed interest on the life and times of George Reeves?

LK- Oh sure. Look at the prices Speeding Bullet and Hollywood Kryptonite were selling for on eBay recently. Speeding Bullet got over two hundred dollars. It is really amazing how people are racing to read this subject. Thankfully, Jan decided to print a second updated version to answer the demand.  Both Carl Glass of Glass House Presents and I have seen a rise in the interest in e-mails alone. I responded to probably a hundred e-mails in September because of Hollywoodland. It was exhausting. Tracking on Readyhost.com, both TAC and GHP saw a huge spike in hits during September ‘06. To help with my responses, I wrote Flight of the Innocent, my Hollywoodland - historical counter-essay. It made it a lot easier to communicate overall. I think it helped Carl too. He and I pretty much agree a lot on this subject. While the essay helps with the abundance of the topic, I still enjoy a focused e-mail discussion on any of the issues. There are so many great people out there that have had this interest for so long and many new people are writing all the time with fond memories of George and the rest of the Adventures of Superman cast.

George left an everlasting positive effect on his fans. Something the newspaper media fails to understand. They don’t see George has a caring following and regardless of the true circumstances of his death, we admire him just the same because we believe the way he treated people as equals, the things he did in life to help others, and his career are fascinating traits. If idolizing him for raising hundreds of thousands of dollars, a tremendous amount of money in those days, visiting children in cancer wards with no agenda for publicity means we are hero worshipping, well then so be it...I’m guilty as charged. He is my hero, not for saving Lois Lane and Jimmy Olsen 104 times, but for living up to the same qualities that Superman a hero. We know he couldn't save the world in real life, but he did his part.  A positive role model? Absolutely. I see the real man and so do many others. These are good qualities to admire. As Mr. Larson has said, “George  gave away more money to out-of-work actors than was ever paid back to him.” George was admired greatly in his time and still is today. Just ask, Bette Shayne, Stephanie Shayne, Fred Crane, Dabbs Greer. In real life, he did have faults, but I believe these lapses are very much over-embellished and treated like he was the only one who ever lifted a martini glass. It was the times and the place.

It’s funny. If you characterize George as nothing but being a good man, you’ll be labeled a "blind hero worshipping fan boy." Reflect on his social drinking, female relationships and you will fall into the clutches of idolizing a selfish bum.

For example, George has been defined as a “womanizer.” Has any woman ever come forward as a jilted lover? Not that I’ve ever heard of.  So “womanizer” seems a little harsh. I was sitting in the Kenneth Hahn Hall on July 10, 2001 next to Joanne Siegel her daughter Laura Siegel-Larson (both very nice people). We attended the 50th Anniversary of the 1951 filming of the Superman TV show. While chatting, she told me of a story of meeting George before she was married and long before he became Superman. She was working in a Los Angeles nightclub and he introduced himself, asked her what time she got off work and would she be interested in going out dancing? She said they went out together and he was wonderfully charming and every bit the gentlemen. Her story is also told recently in the Feb. 2006 magazine issue of Alter Ego, by Roy Thomas.

Then we have Toni Mannix, ten years older, married to a man herself almost fifteen years her senior. The long-term relationship between George and Toni was an open-secret within the Hollywood community. No sneaking around, no hiding, and accepted by Mr. Mannix. I once believed the relationship between Eddie and Toni was closer to a father-daughter relationship. It seemed the only logical explanation. But as Mr. Larson recently cast light on the subject for me. George had explained to him that Eddie and Toni had an “arrangement.” Eddie had his girlfriends as many studio executives did in those days and eventually he fell in love with a woman of Japanese culture.  If you understand how Eddie and Toni met, when she met George, when Eddie and Toni married, the committing to each other, but allowing each other secondary relationships and they being strong devout Catholics who do not believe in divorce, it becomes more clear how this worked.

In the 40’s, George had tried the "all-American traditional marriage" with Ellanora. They were married for approximately eight years and unfortunately it didn't work out. Ellanora was his true love. While they tried, they weren't successful in producing a child of their own. I have a strong belief George was sterile. This may be one reason why their marriage didn't succeed. George, as we know, was a sensitive and considerate man and may not have wanted to face disappointing another woman wanting to start a family. As for Toni or Leonore, I doubt George saw either as candidates for motherhood. Thus, he found a safe haven from a possible disappointing situation. We also know from Alejandro Vacio, Nati (his lifelong best friend) and Queta's son that George would have loved a child of his own.  Wanting to be part of a family, George asked Alejandro to call him “Uncle Jorge.” 

EC-Is there any other project you might be interested in or like seeing in the future as it pertains to allowing fans to know more about George Reeves?

LK- Can we expect to see more? First, I want to say any well-done book on George is always great. There have been some really great books out there over the years. Most recently, Peter Murano’s The George Reeves Adventures of Superman Companion Book which was a wonderful surprise. Jan Alan Henderson, Steve Randisi and Mike Bifulco Behind The Crimson Cape: The Cinema of George Reeves was great to read and backed with amazing photos. I was happy to be a small contributor to that, as well as Jan’s second edition to Speeding Bullet. Larry Ward’s second edition of Truth, Justice and the American Way: The Life and Times of Noel Neill, The Original Lois Lane was another bright spot this year. And everyone got into the spotlight in that one. I don’t want to leave out Mike Bifulco’s Tenth Anniversary Edition of Superman on Television and Spaceman Lost. These are all very tough acts to follow. I know each of these individuals and I know the hard work each put into these projects. Hopefully, there’s more to come.

Where does that leave Saving George Reeves? Since the second CD was finished, I have more than enough material to do a third release. But another CD presentation doesn’t interest me. My dream is to put something in the hands of the reader who can plop down on the couch or relax for several hours in the backyard.  As opposed to sitting at the computer monitor for which all our spouses complain we spend too much time in front of anyway (LOL). I’d like to take the best articles and features from the hardcopy TAC fanzine issues and expand upon it with the many items I’ve assembled in the CD presentations and the many items bought since then. In all, it would be a tremendous volume which would be unique to everything that’s been done before and anything anyone I know is considering of their own. Basically it would be titled: The Best of The Adventures Continue with George Reeves. A lot of fans missed out on those fanzine issues. It would be a tribute to George Reeves in the tradition of TAC along with a large number of surprises. I presented the idea to Jim Nolt, who loves it. I have mentioned it to others who also think the idea is exciting. Now please understand, this is not by any means an official announcement. It’s a dream. One I’d love to see come true. Basically it’s a matter of printing cost. Something neither Jim Nolt nor I have. But I am starting to save for it. Anyway, Eddie I hope I answered your questions. 


I just wanted to say thanks to Lou for taking the time out to answer some questions for us in regards to his “Saving George Reeves” CD. As good as the internet is, there is still a lot of misinformation out there and with this CD Lou not only gives fans something to enjoy, but also gives us an accurate account of this actor who has generated legions of fans and shows us another side of the man in the crimson cape. Thanks Lou for giving us a true Hollywoodland story.

You can purchase Lou Koza’s “Saving George Reeves” CD by going online to www.jimnolt.com

In addition, when you purchase Lou’s CD, Lou will donate a portion of the sale to the Myasthenia Gravis Foundation where George served as the National Chairman.

December 2006


FANS LINE UP TO SEE

THE ORIGINAL LOIS LANE

NOEL NEILL

AT CHILLER THEATRE IN

NEW JERSEY

By Eddie Caro

At the Chiller Theatre show in East Rutherford, New Jersey, I witnessed fans line up to see the sweetheart of America’s favorite superhero. Fans old and new crowded Conference Room A of the Sheraton Hotel to see the original Lois Lane, Noel Neill. There were other comic book artists and television actors/actresses nearby, but fans lined up to see Noel. They were there to hear her stories and/or have a picture taken with the icon they watched time and time again. They watched her get saved by Superman, who was played by the unforgettable George Reeves, the one who many consider their favorite Man of Steel.

When you entered the conference room you immediately saw a big picture of George Reeves dressed as Superman with Noel together in a publicity shot which had been taken years ago. Alongside this picture was a poster stating in bold letters that Noel Neill is the Original Lois Lane.  Then, standing by the table, as big as life, was Ms. Noel Neill. She was there waiting to greet you with a warm smile and wearing a blue shirt with that famous “S” symbol on it. Displayed on her table were various pictures of her in different episodes of The Adventures of Superman, along with other motion pictures including the two Superman serials she appeared in.

As the fans came to see her, I saw that many were middle-aged men and women approaching her with wide smiles.  Some came to have pictures signed that they had previously taken with Ms. Neill, their favorite television reporter. As they approached her, they had a gleam in their eye. As they greeted Ms. Neill, many fans told her that The Adventures of Superman television series was their show while growing up and how it impacted in their life. As the younger generation came to see Ms. Neill, some were surprised to find out that Christopher Reeve was not the first one to don that famous crimson cape. They learned that there were others that flew through the skies of Metropolis on the big screen and television before they were born.

As fans were coming in many of them stated that they drove for miles not to see the other thirty plus actors/actresses/comic book artists in attendance at Chiller, but to see only one person, Ms. Noel Neill. Fans were telling her stories about how they used to rush home after school so they could see The Adventures of Superman on television. They proudly admitted that years later they continued to see the show whenever it aired on television.

I saw many adults leading their children and grandchildren to the room and telling them that this was the person they grew up with and watched for so many years on television. They also told stated that George and Noel were their Superman and Lois Lane, and there is no one that could ever replace them in their heart.

In addition to having a personalized autograph picture(s) of Ms. Neill, She gladly posed with fans and had her picture taken over and over again. I watched adults feel like children again as they took a picture with her. They thanked her for giving them memories they can share with their children and grandchildren. They also told stories of how they felt as a kid waiting for George to change to that famous costume that so many of us have duplicated in our own unique way.  There was one individual who was so excited that he finally had the chance to meet Ms. Neill that he almost forgot his autographed picture that she signed for him. He told her that he waited years for this opportunity to come, and he was not going to miss it for the world. He left with a tear in his eye saying that her show meant so much to him. He thanked her over and over again, as did many other fans, for giving them memories they would never forgot.

As I left her room and walked the hallway, I heard people saying that Ms. Neill was as sweet in person as she was on television and how happy they were to finally meet her. As Hollywood has not yet placed a star in her name on the Walk of Fame, she will forever be a star to us. She and the rest of the cast members of The Adventures of Superman will continue to give us thrills and adventures for years to come. There are not many shows on today that can say that. Fans are also anxious to see Ms. Neill in Season 2 of The Adventures of Superman on DVD, which will be on sale on January 17, 2006. They will then be able to relive the thrilling Adventures of Superman starring their favorite Lois Lane, Noel Neill.

December 2005


 

AN INTERVIEW WITH GLENN WHITMORE

DC COMIC BOOK COLORIST

By Eddie Caro

When you buy a comic book these days, you look at who the book was about, who wrote the story, and who the artist is. Recently, the comic book colorists seem to be getting as much attention as the comic book writer and/or artist themselves. Comic book colorists have finally come out from under the spotlight and are now given credit for making the comic book artist’s sketches stand out even more. I recently had a chance to meet DC Comic Book Colorist Glenn Whitmore. Glenn worked on several Superman comic book titles, which include the historic issue where our beloved Man of Steel succumb to injuries suffered to him by Doomsday. This changed the course of Superman history. I recently was at a comic book show where Glenn was in attendance. He was a personable gentleman and answered any and all questions given to him by fellow comic book fans.  Glenn was kind enough to answer questions given to him by me about his time at DC Comics and other work he is currently involved in.

Eddie Caro-How long where you a colorist for DC Comics and what comic book issues did you work on?

Glenn Whitmore-I freelanced as a colorist at DC for ten years, 10 of those under contract. My first assignment was Hawk & Dove mini-series (drawn by Rob Liefeld) during the summer of '88. Later that year, editor Mike Carlin offered me the Superman books, and I began on Superman (#27) and Adventures Of Superman (#450). I was still on board when Action Comics relaunched (remember Action Comics Weekly?) a year later, and a few years after that, Superman: Man Of Steel. I worked on every regular issue until about 1999-2000. I also colored a "run" on the Flash in the early'90's, as well as Justice Society (drawn by the late, great Mike Parobeck), Justice League Task Force, and Power Of Shazam.

EC-Did you do any other work besides colorist on any other comic book issues?

GW-I penciled a cover image for Justice League Of America Archives #3 (inked by Dick Giordano). My own self-published Captain Clockwork debuted in Big Bang Comics (#31) which I wrote/drew/inked/lettered. In ‘02, I penciled and inked a Dr. Stellar story for Big Bang's World Class Comics Special, penciled a "Blitz" chapter for a Big Bang summer special ('03?), and drew various spot illustrations for them along the way.

EC-If you had a choice to pick any assignment to work on a comic book what would your choice be and why?

GW-Anything drawn by my favorite artists (Steve Rude, Darwyn Cooke among them) would be my dream assignment to color. I would have loved to color something on the level of DC: The New Frontier. Also, anything with the JSA would be great to color as well.

EC-Was there any artist, inker, or colorist you wanted to meet while you were employed by DC Comics?

GW-It was a big thrill to meet Jerry Ordway when I first broke in. I wanted to meet Alex Toth, but he's a recluse. Meeting Steve Rude at Chicago Wizard con 2000 and seeing one of his sketchbooks was a near-religious experience. I do regret not meeting Mike Parobeck before he passed in the mid '90s.

EC-Were you able to keep any pieces of art that you worked on at DC Comics?

GW-I received nearly ALL of my originals (xeroxed black and white pages with water colored specs and notations) back from the separator. They are all stored in boxes on a shelf in my garage. I even have a few color "keys" (color printouts with separate plates for cyan, magenta, yellow, black) for some covers I did.

EC-It seems like the comic book writers and artists have been getting all the attention, but recently colorists seem to be getting their due. It was said by some comic book fans that Guy Major’s color work has enhanced John Bryne’s artwork in the current series of Action Comics. Do you think that colorists now may be getting the attention that in the past have been given to comic book artists or writers?

GW-Colorists ARE getting more attention on the higher profile assignments, even getting billing on the cover along with the writers and artists. Over the past ten years, I've seen the role of colorist become more important and I don't see this as an entirely good thing. To me, modern artists are relying on the colorist TOO much to make sense of their images with over rendering and computer effects. Don't get me wrong. The computer is the
best thing to happen to comic book coloring since comics started. But I feel that it doesn't mean that pencilers and inkers can shift the responsibility for good page design, spotting blacks, and effective storytelling. Okay: end of rant.

EC-When DC Comics hired you to be the colorist for the Superman comic book series were you aware that you would be contributing to a historical event in Superman comics?

GW-When I first became Superman colorist, I was unaware of any "planned events" for the future. The engagement may have been in the works, but the "death of" certainly wasn't. I was present at a Super-team summit when the "death of" storyline was seriously suggested. As a joke, I would annually suggest Superman Red, Superman Blue. The rest of the team would always laugh. One year, I didn't make it to the summit. Later, when I glanced at the plot grids from that summit, there it was: "Superman Red, Superman Blue". So I guess, you have me to credit/blame for that.

EC-Knowing that comic book and non-comic book fans from all over the world would read Superman issue #75 in which Superman dies, were you nervous about the results? 

GW-I was generally kept very busy, and I really didn't have time to dwell on the importance. When the "death of" storyline was first suggested, to me, it was just another great storyline to hook the readers. The DC/Warner publicity and marketing departments did a stellar job in making the whole event a success. It took me, and probably the others, by surprise.

EC-Did any media outlets in regards to your work on the death of Superman series interview you?

GW-I was not interviewed by the media specifically on the Death Of Superman. Shortly after his return, I was interviewed on a Collector's show on the local cable access channel. On it, I covered various topics, and touched on the subject of Superman's death and return. The show was replayed ad infinitum for about a year and one or two strangers even recognized me. Not exactly Glennmania, but still very cool. I think I have a copy floating around here somewhere.

EC-As you were growing up in Morris County, New Jersey do you remember how you were first exposed to the world of DC or Marvel comics?

GW-In the early '70s, I was first exposed to Batman and Superman through re-runs of their respective TV shows. Around the same time Channel 5 in New York ran the Filmation Batman, Aquaman, and Justice League cartoons every afternoon. It was there that I got hooked on the DC universe.

EC-What type of schooling or training did you receive to become an artist/colorist?

GW-I attended the Joe Kubert School in Dover, NJ which was 15 minutes from my house. Upon graduation, I worked for the Morristown Daily Record that colored its DAILY comics page. A fellow staff artist suggested I take my pages to DC to try and get some color work. Over the next several months, I took my samples to Bob Rozakis (production manager) and learned the ins and outs of color guides and color codes.

EC-In the year 2000 a comic book character you called Captain Clockwork debuted in the Big Bang Comics #31 published by Image. Can you tell us how you came up with the idea of this new comic book superhero?

GW-For the longest time, I had vague and pointless ideas for long term series' involving a time traveling hero in which I could not interest publishers. At some point, I decided short stories with a focus (and to please myself) would be more productive and get my points across more effectively. Also, I had four different designs for Clockwork and I couldn't decide which to use. I figured out a way to use all four in these shorter stories taking place along history. I try to create stories in which the hero has to make crucial, tough decisions. Making tough decisions is something everyday people can relate to.

EC-Are you working on any projects now?

GW-My only current project is to complete enough Clockwork stories to self-publish a series which I hope to publish in '06 (when I turn 40). I'm also open to any additional coloring assignments (like Steve Rude's The Moth) which I recently colored. I'm looking forward to the Moth series starting up again soon.

EC-Will you be making any appearances in the near future at any comic book shows so fans can meet you?

GW-As of now, I have no planned appearances. I'm always open to making local appearances and hope to do so soon. I'm hoping to add some bigger shows in the future when my book is finally published.

EC-Now that Warner Brothers is finally releasing the “Adventures of Superman” on DVD  will you be getting a copy?

GW-I just bought this yesterday and I'm 4 episodes into it. I LOVE IT!!!!  I'll be submitting a review as soon I can.


I wish to again thank Glenn Whitmore for taking the time to answer questions about himself and his work on Superman along with submitting these pictures for all of us to see. Be on the lookout for seeing more of his work on Captain Clockwork and The Moth coming in 2006. If you wish to find out more about Glenn Whitmore’s artwork or order an issue of Captain Clockwork visit www.captainclockwork.com and see one of the up and coming comic book artists/colorists in the industry.

December 2005 


 

OFFICIAL REVIEWS OF

THE ADVENTURES OF SUPERMAN

SEASON ONE DVD SET

By Eddie Caro

When Warner Brothers finally released the Adventures of Superman Season One on DVD, I wanted to hear from some fellow fans about what they thought of the job Warner Brothers did.  Many people had some questions about the DVD set. I hope these reviews will help us decide if Warner Brothers did a good job when releasing this series. More reviews from fellow George Reeves Historians to follow.   

Jan Alan Henderson

On October 18, I opened my mailbox, and there was The Adventures of Superman five DVD box set. Eddie Caro has asked me to share some of my thoughts, so here they are:

Fifty-four years after the final frame of The Adventures of Superman was put into the can, we have one of the most comprehensive documentation on everyone’s favorite series. And oh, what a joy it is to relive those bygone days in Metropolis, which in reality was Los Angeles.

The episodes are crisp, and the supplemental material gives Superman fans young and old something to explore. There are some flaws, but after all of these years they should be easy to compensate for. The special features add to the presentation and packaging. Enjoy!

 

Mister X

Many people, myself included, are no doubt tempted to criticize the Warner's release of TAOS Season 1. It certainly could have been better. Well, it can always be better. In all modesty, I think I did a better job in some ways than Warner. It helps to be a pirate, no legal obstacles. And of course, as far as Warner is concerned, this is first and foremost a commercial venture. They're in it to make money, and no doubt they entered into this project with some trepidation, wondering if they'd sell enough to make back their investment. Well, the rapid announcement of the release of Season 2 obviously answers that question!

I think people should remember that when TAOS was released on videotape by Columbia House how expensive it was. Twenty dollars a tape for 20 tapes containing a total of 60 episodes! Time and technology has changed all that! Today's price is certainly right!

The menus and general layout of the DVDs are a disappointment. The music is dreary, and the menus are not easily navigated. There are no chapters within each episode, which further impedes navigation. The sound bites used in the menus are totally unrelated. I think Warner could have done better. They should have hired Randy Garrett!

All the episodes have the identical opening sequence, which is ok, except they didn't use the one from "The Haunted Lighthouse", which was unique.

The printing on the discs themselves is fabulous! But, the packaging is tricky. Unless one takes real care, discs can be easily scratched.

Precious little was done to restore the audio, which is replete with background noise, which could have been easily fixed. A case in point: In "The Unknown People Part II, Superman asks that Luke Benson and his mob "stop acting like Nazi storm troopers". Its a seminal moment in the series, and the sound track is damaged, the final syllable of storm troopers, the final "s", is clipped. There's a break in the audio. If you compare it with the discs I've created, you'll notice the difference. I fixed it, took all of ten minutes.

Listen closely to the pitch of the voices in the final scene of Superman On Earth. This has been off pitch in virtually every version I've ever seen. They took a stab at fixing it, but not a good one.

The episodes were obviously digitized from 16-millimeter prints, which explains their graininess. Compare them with Pony Express Days, which is surely 35-millimeter. To briefly explain the difference, the larger the frame, the greater the resolution, and the less grain when its enlarged, just as the more pixels in a digital photograph, the better it looks enlarged. Motion picture film frames are in a 4x3 ratio, so a 16mm frame is 192 square millimeters, and a 35mm frame is 918.75sqmm, nearly 5x greater area. I was hoping that Warner made new master prints from the original negatives, but they chose not to do so. Perhaps they no longer exist, or they've deteriorated beyond repair, or it was economically unfeasible to do so.

Other obvious things are the lack of previews, and the missing emblematic theme music that Warner apparently wouldn't pay royalties to use, hence the dreary music used in the menus, and it probably explains the missing previews too.

The extras are hit and miss. I enjoyed Pony Express Days and Inkwell to Backlot. Gary Grossman was good, if inaccurate in spots. I would have much preferred the comments of Jack Larson or Jim Nolt to those of Chuck Harter, who seemed rather lethargic in his narration.

But, all in all, it’s still a great achievement, and I'm certainly not disappointed. 1953 promises to be even better. I would certainly think that any TAOS fan would be delighted with these DVDs. I know I am.

 

Lou Koza

I've been reading some of the comments regarding The Adventures of Superman DVD box set and I can't say you guys are all that much wrong. Although I think overall it is a great box set, hopefully we see improvements with the forthcoming sets.

Kellogg's commercials: A wonderful example to give fans who've never seen these before.

Pony Express Days: Extraordinary print. Seeing George riding with guns blaring is absolutely out of this world. A great choice by Warner's to include this short feature. Let's hope for more. A++

Gary Grossman Commentaries: Fun, informative, Ex: Excellent description of the sets used for other films. The opening intro building is the Mutual of Omaha Bldg, not LA City Hall. Inaccuracies, Ex: In The Stolen Costume, Gary identified Geta Van Borg or Connie as she is known in the episode as "Alice." In The Haunted Lighthouse, Gary perceived a spliced scene as switching a stunt man for George. At that exact moment of the splice, I'm absolutely certain without a shadow of doubt it was George during both sides of the split. And I'm also absolutely certain it was the bad guy that was switched out for a dummy going over the edge. In The Stolen Costume, Mr. Grossman mentions that Superman comics can be seen on the racks behind a man selling newspapers on the street corner. I always thought it was well known that the series helped sell the Man of Steel's comic book's and visa versa with ads and cast bio's on the comic books. A missed opportunity to mention this. Otherwise Gary's enthusiasm and back to being a little boy helped improve his grade to an A-.

Chuck Harter Commentaries: No offense, but I feel Chuck was ill prepared for this effort. Whether it was his fault or perhaps Warners gave him no advanced notice and he just winged it. I say this because he seemed to repeat several thought ideas more than once. For example: 1) "Here George looks good" is stated three four times and 2) the fact the show aimed at adults as well as children is stated three times in two of his episode commentaries. In addition, I felt there were a number of missed opportunities to reflect on important subjects, for example: 1) No mention of the music, narrator or effects that went into the classic intro. If the expert is weak in the music and effects department, I could understand, but at least mention who voiced the opening narration. 2) During The Evil Three, there was no background given for either Rhys Williams or Jonathan Hale who is best known to TV Superman fans as Professor Roberts in perhaps THE most classic episode Panic in the Sky. In addition, Mr. Hale is best known to a broader film enthusiast as Mr. Dithers, the boss of Dagwood in the Blondie series. 3) With the ghost of Taylor looking in the window, here it should have been identified and discussed that this is the first scene that sent kids running for their Mommy and Daddy and due to an outcry from parents caused Kellogg's to have this and several other scenes edited from this episode. Later, when Elsa is pushed down the ramp, Mr. Harter finally makes note of scene edits. Side note: It is often described by many that Elsa is pushed down stairs. This is not the case, since it is a ramp and her decline is proven by her smooth transaction and during two other scenes with Perry and Jimmy as they walk down. Unlike stairs that would have a person bobbing up and down during the decent. In Crime Wave, there is no mention that the scenes during Superman's final push to eliminate crime in Metropolis montage is completely overlooked for more discussions that the show is not entirely aimed at children buy also for adults. Perhaps this was a good time to discuss it, but why repeat it. The entire show is a good example of it and the season being aimed at adults. The first time should be enough to make the point. Maybe something all together could have been discussed during this period. I also could do without the deep voice "BAM", "BOOM" sound effects Mr. Harter was making during a particular scene. And on a final note, Mr. Harter has for years stated George and Elvis look alike. Personally, I don't see the resemblance, nor the reason to bring it up. C+

I want to give both credit for their participation and the benefit of the doubt that perhaps the logistics of the commentaries gave no advanced notice of which episodes Mr. Grossman and Mr. Harter would be working on, therefore both may have worked without guideline notations. This is the first run, we all learn from our mistakes and perhaps they'll do better next time if given the opportunity.

Box Graphics: All around, fantastic work inside and out. The text, the DVD graphics, images all look absolutely wonderful. One could argue there should be no excuse for some episode description mix ups. Personally, I'm willing to overlook it. A

Box Configuration Design: I like many do not like the overlapping discs. But I do like the easy in and out disc access center push button. B

From Inkwell to Backlot: Fun to watch. Jack is great to see. B

Episode Picture Quality: Simply outstanding, even with the "as is" condition of The Stolen Costume. After all, isn't this what we fans are really looking for? This is the premier feature of the entire box set. The showcase of the box set that stands entirely on its own with or without the extras. A+++

Major Disappointment: The excuse Warner gave recently in a NY newspaper article prior to the DVD box set release was that they did not have all the Previews and therefore did not include the small number they do have is no excuse. They included three of many Kellogg's commercials known to exist. So why not a sample of the Previews? Warner at the very least should have included what they have. If not having all of them was an obstacle, for the better of the majority, this could have been easily remedied with any well known number of contacts. Personally, I have them all, I know people who have them all. The losers are the many fans out there that are not privy to our network of enthusiast and most likely seeing the Previews for the first time would sure be an extraordinary treat. Aside from that, the Previews belong with this season regardless if they were not part of the original Maxwell 35mm prints

Summary: I guess we as fans have high standards for our favorite television star, Mr. George Reeves. Possibly, because of the high standards by which he worked by. And therefore we should expect nothing but the best effort from a company such as Warner Brothers. Despite some of the shortcomings, there is an abundance to enjoy and I'm certain future installments are going to be great too.
 

Carl Glass

On October 18th, 2005, the day of waiting was over for the devoted fans of this classic TV series The Adventures of Superman The complete first season. Admittedly, I was not on this bandwagon for the many months of anticipation. However, being one of “George Reeves” kids and reading the initial responses on various boards on the Internet, the suspense was overwhelming and I made my purchase that day.

The Packaging:  George Reeves, with fists on hips, planet orbs, stars in background, and Superman logo above in a colorized uniform of red, blue, and yellow from the standard gray and brown of the '51 season was truly impressive. On the backside, Allan Asherman, the DC comic historian gives a good historical synopsis of what to expect from the 5-Disc set (although the synopsis on the inside is out of order – Episodes 14, 15 & 16). The layout, with the special features included sparked my interest, especially the short I had longed to see for many years, Pony Express Days. 

After opening the package to see the display, I found the laser cover application to each disc very appealing, however, the overlapping of discs would present a challenge.  Before removing these discs, you must remind yourself that you are a skilled surgeon. Many of you reading this know exactly what I mean.

Episode Quality:  In reading comments before this release, many have been concerned over the kind of prints to be worked from.  Would they be from 16mm prints or 35mm? Experts have informed us that episode 13, The Stolen Costume would be most difficult to restore because the original print no longer exists or was badly damaged.  Well, as for the quality of that episode, they are right, but the story overcomes all that.  I must admit that I am not astute in these matters and leave that to the experts, but I will say that I am not disappointed with what I’ve seen thus far appreciating the visual clarity for what it is. The menu selection is formatted in a comic book page form, believing it is an attempt to be clever and entertaining.  It serves its purpose.

Pony Express Days My hat goes off to Warners for doing a remarkable job with restoring this outstanding 19-minute short with George Reeves as the humble, yet enthusiastic, young “Bill Cody.”  I understand this was restored from a 35mm fine grain negative. You’ll love George’s riding and shooting skills!  George saves the day and the Union.

Special Features:  Gary Grossman and Chuck Harter were featured guests on 4 key episodes, The Haunted Lighthouse, The Stolen Costume, The Evil Three, and Crime Wave.

The most crucial element in these commentaries is not a style of enthusiasm versus a lackluster performance, but accuracy. Never having done a commentary, and would not understand the pressures that might go with it, many inaccuracies are evident, I choose to make a negative into a positive.  I have been challenged by both Grossman and Harter to do some research into information.

Harter’s over-emotional descriptions and assessments are a waste of valuable time. Both commentators alluded to the Daily Planet building in the ‘51 episodes to be that of City Hall in Los Angeles. It is in fact The Mutual of Omaha Building. They both were informative about the film noir aspect to the series concerning light, shadow, backdrops, special and cinematic effects for that time period, giving props to a crew who had experience in B film working with time and budget constraints. Both fail to mention the stock music library known as the “Capitol Cue Package.”

You could say I’m somewhat picayunish when it comes to statements like “When children watched this scene or episodes back in 1951,” or the reference of an episode listed in “TV Guide” of that same year.  The show was released in small markets in ’52, and then across the nation in ‘53.  George Reeves was 37 years old in 1951, not 38.

I have always been fascinated with the character support actors on TAOS.  It was my hope that in The Evil Three, that Mr. Harter would divulge in the careers of Jonathan Hale, Cecil Elliott, and Rhys Williams. I was challenged, learning that Jonathan Hale had appeared in over 200 films, but I remember him well as Mr. Dithers on the Blondie movie series from the 1940’s. He was not mentioned for being Professor Roberts in Panic In The Sky.

Cecil Elliot had more than just theatrical experience. She began her film debut in Secret of The Chateau (1934), and made film appearances throughout the 1930’s. Ms. Elliot made appearances in many films and television throughout the next three decades including The Killing (1956), The Reluctant Astronaut (1967), and 1974’s Chinatown.

Rhys Williams: had a notable face on film beginning with How Green Was My Valley in 1941. With over eighty motion picture appearances, Williams was also popular on the small screen with roles in Bonanza, Maverick, 77 Sunset Strip, and so many others. His career spans from 1941 until his death in 1969.

“Private Eye Candy Meyers” played by Frank Jenks also appeared in the 1954 TAOS episode The Magic Necklace, as “Lazy.” Gary Grossman, at the end of his commentary on The Stolen Costume, was just about ready to inform us as to whether or not this episode was from the radio show but time expired from the commentary. The fact is, Stolen Costume and all the first season shows except Molemen had their basis in radio because Robert Maxwell and his wife Jessica produced the radio show for a decade. The character “Candy Meyers” originated on the radio, as was “Inspector Henderson.”  Chuck Harter comments that the Warner Brothers print is longer than the Kellogg’s print in Crime Wave. This is simply not so! There is more George and the cast in the Kellogg’s version. He also gets the amount of cuts in The Evil Three wrong.

I enjoyed immensely the From Inkwell To Backlot feature, with jazz music in the background. It had a nice touch, and it was insightful to hear commentary from Jack Larson and the others. Now that you have these DVD’s in your possession, let me remind you of one fact.  There was a time when we had nothing! Enjoy! Thanks Warner Brothers! “A little bit of something is better than a whole lot of nothing!”

I wish to thank all the above contributing reviewers for taking the time to share their thoughts with us.  If it wasn’t for the fans to keep George Reeves memories alive, we might not have a DVD set to review.

November 2005


THE MEN WHO FOUND THE MAN

BEHIND THE CRIMSON CAPE

By Eddie Caro

I am sure many people like myself who saw George Reeves for the very first time saw him when he appeared in the Adventures of Superman television series. As I grew older and watched movies and television shows over the years, I never saw George Reeves in any other role. This made me believe he was just here for all of us to enjoy in being our Superman. I would later see him in the beginning scenes of the classic film Gone with the Wind, but did not see him in any other motion pictures. Years ago, when I purchased the book Superman on Television written by Michael Bifulco, it gave me a detailed synopsis of the television episodes he did while playing Superman. This again made me think he only appeared as the Man of Steel. As I looked for more George Reeves material I did not have much luck finding information about him. Mind you, this is before the Internet. Searching bookstores and libraries gave very limited information on George Reeves. My guess is that people only saw him as Superman, and nobody wanted to take the time to research him. They were probably thinking again that they only knew him for leaping out of windows when trouble arises. When I discovered the website The Adventures Continue, I found out that George Reeves had done a series of motion pictures, and various people did in fact gathered personal information about him. Seeing this, I was curious again to see the man before he became Superman.

While visiting the site, I found out that two men who are also friends and fellow writers of various entertainment magazines gave us a total look of the motion picture career of George Reeves, the man before he donned the crimson cape. Steve Randisi and Jan Alan Henderson, who are both avid admirers of George Reeves, gives fans a look at the man they admired for so long. Both Jan and Steve took time out of their busy schedules to answer few questions about their book so fans can see the man before he became Superman.


EC: Both of you have previous writing experience with articles that appeared in different entertainment magazines. Jan, you yourself wrote a book titled Speeding Bullet: The Life and Bizarre Death of George Reeves. Whose idea was it to start a book titled Behind The Crimson Cape?

JAH: Steve's.  We were in Metropolis, Illinois, when he proposed the idea to me.  The hot summer nights and all the activities kept the excitement level high.  I was very lucky that someone brought along a guitar, and allowed me to play for most of the visit.  I believe Steve mentioned it one morning after a very long night.  At that particular point, Michael Bifulco also mentioned to me his idea, which eventually became Spaceman Lost, which is an extremely entertaining and well-written book.  Even though it is a fictionalized account, it is probably much more sensitive to the memory of George Reeves than some other projects have been in the past, and most likely other projects will be in the future.  When Steve pitched what we now know as Behind the Crimson Cape, I was resistant to the idea because of the fact that in my opinion a goodly amount of filmographies are written as intellectual manifestos by authors with superiority complexes and way too much time spent at college.   I told him that I would remain open to the idea, but we needed some "hooks."  I can be a real pain when it comes to this stuff, and that goes for any of my other writing in my 18-year career, because I believe that if I'm going to leave something behind, hopefully it will entertain as well as educate, and not treat the readers as second class citizens.

SR: True, it was basically my idea, but the concept was born out of conversations I had with several people in Metropolis. I was there with Jan in June of 2000 and we had many talks with some of the locals. While all these folks are tremendous Superman fans, very few are what you could call dedicated Reeves aficionado. That is, most of them didn't know anything about George's career except for the TV series. They knew that his first big break was in Gone with the Wind and that was about it. But what about the Cagney pictures, the Hoppy series, or classics like Blood and Sand; So Proudly We Hail; Blue Gardenia; and all those great "B" films at Warners, and the smaller studios? We thought George's screen work warranted further analysis and recognition.

EC: When you had to obtain research material was the Internet any help to either of you in regards to writing this book, or did you find that sources were limited?

JAH: I can't answer for Steve or Mike, but I have a severe mistrust of the information provided by Internet sources.  While it can be a thumbnail, or an outline if you prefer, for whatever you might care to do with it, it is generally riddled with inaccuracies and is feeble.  When I look at Internet Movieline Database, it almost makes me want to lobby for a job correcting all the zingers.  I was very lucky I came under the influence of five people in the print business:  George Turner, who edited American Cinematographer Magazine, who along with his partner Michael H. Price originated and wrote the Forgotten Horrors series;  Mike Stein of FilmFax magazine; Mike Copner, the creator/editor/publisher of Cult Movies Magazine (and look for Issue #41 in the fall); and last but not least, my good friend and partner in crime, Mike Bifulco.  These five individuals, through example and discussion, have hopefully taught me how to do this gig.  To bluntly answer your question, these guys are the creme de la creme of researchers.  Maybe a little rubbed off.

SR: The internet was somewhat helpful, but certainly not integral to doing this book.

EC: How long did it take for both of you to complete Behind The Crimson Cape?

JAH: Five years.  Written in bits and pieces and on the fly in spare time, or time one does not have to spare.

SR: Yes, it took five years. However, all of the work in the fifth year was done by Jan and Mike. They worked very hard to lay the material out until it became the book that you hold in your hands today. These guys had been through this before and they knew exactly what they were doing. Obviously, they are pros and did an excellent job!

EC: Steve, you live on the East Coast, and Jan, you live on the West Coast. The publisher Michael Bifulco resides in Michigan. Did this cause any problems when trying to produce this book? Since you could not see each other to discuss topics, did this put added pressure on all of you to get this project done?

JAH: Doing a project, whether it be a book, album, or film, is a highly pressurized situation.  Most people don't have clear ideas going into these things, which is why these movies cost millions.  These independent guys with their digicams who actually try to figure it out, make more interesting products than so-called Hollywood Studios.  Doing a book is the same thing.  I was watching the Actors Studio the other day and saw George Carlin, who as usual was tremendously funny.  He made a statement that we are now unleashing technology to cure the ills of the past technology.  So from my standpoint, not being able to meet with the other members of the team, it was incredibly difficult, but when it worked it was great.  Example:  Some of the photographs were not reproduced on the disks I sent Michael Bifulco of the book.  By using a scanner and emailing Michael the missing photos, we got a far better result than any of us thought possible.  The whole thing is a trade-off.  We were lucky we had a team that thought on its feet.

SR: The distance really didn't present any problems. I enjoyed sending Jan material; then looking forward to receiving feedback in the mail. That's why I really don't think the internet was what that important in the process.

EC: The book summary states that you have over 300 illustrations of George Reeves from different aspects of his movie career. Were these photos from your personal collections?

JAH: Yes.

SR: Yes

EC: Since you had such a large collection of illustrations of photos of George for your book, what made you decide to have a sketch done of him for the cover instead of adding one of the many pictures at your disposal? Who is the artist that did the cover for you?

JAH: The art work was done by a dear friend of more decades than either of us will admit, named Larry Byrd.  He was responsible for the artwork and editing of the Graveyard Examiner column in the massively popular Famous Monsters of Filmland.  He had also contributed to Fantastic Monsters of the Films, and has done album covers for me.  The reason we didn't use a photo is because we had already tread that ground twice.  Adding Larry to the team was one of my provisos for doing this gig.  The idea was—don't hit 'em with the same thing three times.  Our good friend Randy Garrett also has done what I consider brilliant renderings of George. 

SR: About the covers. We wanted to do something a bit different from what's been done in the past. I love artwork. If you look at all the classic movie posters from the so-called Golden Age of Hollywood, almost all of them employ fabulous artwork and graphics. And when Jan said he wanted to use Larry Byrd for the job, I was thrilled because I was already a fan of Larry's work from a magazine back in the 1970s called Pratfall. When I saw the drawings that he created for our book, I nearly flipped!

EC: A lot of fans know George Reeves just as Superman, due to the popularity of the Adventures of Superman television series. This book shows he had appeared in many motion pictures prior to donning the crimson cape. Some of these movies like Samson & Delilah and Gone with the Wind are classics and are shown every so often on cable television. Then there are others, like short films such as the Last Will and Testament of Tom Smith and The Monroe Doctrine. Was it difficult to obtain some of these movies since they don’t appear regularly on cable television if ever?

JAH: Immensely, and immensely expensive.  What people don't realize is that to produce this type of work and present it as we have presented it, ain't cheap.  If someone were to ask me if I thought they should pursue a career in writing these types of materials, I would tell them no unless you're a millionaire.  None of the team are even thousandaires.  People were doing things like selling certain Reeves films of which you speak at the wonderfully affordable price of $250 for a VHS cassette.  This is where I had to put my foot down.  I found other ways to obtain the synopsis and review materials.  The bill for the photographs was astronomical.

SR: It was very time consuming and expensive. Some titles were obviously more difficult to obtain than others. It was sort of like a big Easter Egg hunt.

EC: Both of you stated in your book that when George was in the military he had done many training films during the Second World War.  Do you know how many he did and if you were able to find any to see for yourself? If so, how was his acting back then? Was he destined for greatness or a diamond in the rough?

JAH:  George's acting was always consistent due to his theatrical background.  George's world, in my opinion, was most comfortable when he was acting.  Like any true artist, the problem for artists is life gets in the way.  We did come across one film that is commonly sold through magazines and at collectors shows, which is pretty nauseating.  Not George's part—the subject of the film!  There are other clips in various documentaries, especially a snippet with George and future Superman guest star/Batman serial star Robert Lowery.  We didn't see that entire film.  I'd venture a guess these films do exist somewhere in the government film vaults, if they haven't all turned to vinegar.

SR: How was George's acting? I think George was a tremendously gifted actor; he was disciplined and totally believable in everything he did. Unfortunately, he was—and still is—under-rated as an actor, and that's another reason why we wanted to do this book. You can't determine if a performer is "destined for greatness" based on Army training films. Those little films were just fly-by-night things that actors did back then. It is hard to say exactly how many of them he did. Perhaps more reels will turn up someday. Wouldn't it be wonderful to locate a "lost" George Reeves film?

EC: When you started watching these motion pictures of George Reeves to do your book, did you see them in a different light, since you were writing a review about each and every picture he ever appeared in? When preparing to write for a book about someone you care about, did you notice scenes that you had not seen before?

JAH:  The question is double sided.  Did I notice any scenes I hadn't seen?  Yes.  Did I reconfirm any of my opinions when I watched all these movies before I did Speeding Bullet and edited them down for space?  The answer is yes.  I noticed more about the production values reviewing the films for Behind the Crimson Cape, and what sort of working situations George was in.

SR: When you watch a film over and over, yes, you do notice little things that eluded you the first time around. What really amazed me was the scope of George's talent, especially in films like Always a Bride.

EC: When you were watching George play different roles in his movies from Police Captain in Blue Gardenia, a night club owner in Lydia to a host of other characters, which one could you see George do on a regular basis besides that of a mild mannered reporter?

JAH: The police captain in Blue Gardenia.  There was talk of him doing Dick Tracy after Superman, as his co-star Ralph Byrd (Thunder in the Pines and Jungle Goddess) had died in 1952 from a heart ailment.

SR: I'll go along with Jan about George as Captain Haynes in Blue Gardenia. His only other role that could have developed into a regular assignment would have been the character he played in Jungle Goddess. Although I like to see George in diversified roles, I like him better when he's not playing a "heavy" or villain, as in Rancho Notorious or The Mutineers. Now George as a comic-villain (i.e., The Good Humor Man) is a different story. I think George was capable of being very funny. To be a good comedian, one must be a good actor. And George certainly was that!

EC: You also give the readers a lot of valuable information in the book about some of the people who starred with George in the various movies. Was getting their information difficult to obtain like Sidney Blackmeer’s list of credits when he starred with George in The Monroe Doctrine?

JAH:  Not if you know where to look!

SR: All the credit must go to Jan on this angle.

EC: Michael Price of the Fort Worth Business Press stated that you compiled an exhaustive catalogue of Reeves’ movie assignments. He states your book deals in concise historical and aesthetic discussions in addition to just the fact details. Was that one of your purposes when deciding to write Behind The Crimson Cape?

JAH:  Michael Price is far too kind.  But yes, that was my intention.

SR: Yes, Mr. Price was very generous with his words. I do not know him, but I thank him for his highly positive review.

Note: If you wish to see the article Michael Price wrote about Behind The Crimson Cape visit his site at http://tinyurl.com/bo9x6

EC: On the back of the Behind The Crimson Cape dust cover there are tributes from Noel Neill and Jack Larson. They state that this is a book George would have wished for and it is a long overdue tribute to a gentle man. Were they able to assist you in anyway in the development of your book?

JAH:  Their friendship and kindness over many decades was one of the reasons that Michael and Steve and I tackled this project.  There can be no greater inspirations.

Credit must also be given to Dr. Don Rhoden and Jim Nolt, for starting this whole thing off by creating The Adventures Continue.  Their assistance was crucial to the development of Behind the Crimson Cape.

SR: Jack and Noel have been an inspiration most of my life. They are wonderful people.

EC: If George Reeves was still with us today what do you think his reaction would be to a book totally and completely dedicated to him?

JAH:  He probably would have whacked me on the head with his cane for writing Speeding Bullet!  Then chase me around a tree!  I hope he would have liked Behind the Crimson Cape, and I hope he would have sat me down and pointed out all the other mistakes I haven't found yet, and made me post them on the internet!

SR: I would hope that George would give us a "thumbs up." We tried to pay tribute to him and I hope we succeeded in doing just that.

EC: Warner Brothers recently announced the release of the Adventures of Superman coming soon to DVD.  Do you think with the impending release of Season One will there be renewed interest in the life of George Reeves?

JAH:  To a limited degree.  When you or any of your readers go to the mall and mention the name of George Reeves to people between the ages of 18 and 34, I would wager most people think he was the guy in the wheelchair, who is as we know, Christopher Reeve.  One would hope this would rejuvenate the interest, but let's face it—they are taking more and more of this type of entertainment off our cable boxes.  Classic TV will soon be ruled by 70's and 80's fodder, which is great if you're into that kind of stuff.  But that's probably and hopefully the reason they are coming out on DVD.  I've also seen this audience for this show ebb and flow.  One minute there's 200 people who are interested, and the next minute there's maybe 2,000.  It's wise never to predict what an audience will do.

SR: Jan has already put it quite succinctly.

EC: Can we expect another book from the team of Henderson and Randisi in the future on anything related to the entertainment field?

JAH:  We are in the process, the team that is, of trying to sell the book.  We are attempting to address the concerns of the here and the now of the marketplace, and no discussions have been undertaken on this subject as of yet.  Remember, the book has only been out for a month or so. There hasn't been time in any of the other team members lives for anything other than promotion of the book.

I think it is phenomenal that the amount of people who remember George Reeves, and that's why we did this book.