|
SAVING GEORGE
REEVES
AN HISTORICAL & EDUCATIONAL
CD PRESENTATION
 I
recently purchased a CD that gives fans an historical and educational
outlook of a man who later became our Superman. The CD is titled “Saving
George Reeves,” which was done by noted George Reeves Historian Lou Koza.
When you watch this presentation you can tell immediately that Lou spent
hours upon countless hours of dedicated research on the life and time of
a man whom many called “Honest George.” If the old saying is “A picture
is worth a thousand words,” Lou gives us an encyclopedia of information
to devour, complete with newspaper articles and pictures from Lou’s
personal collection detailing George’s movie and television career. When
I first loaded my “Saving George Reeves” CD One & Two Consolidated
Presentation, I knew I found someone who brought us his version of “Hollywoodland,”
which is presented to us in a Power Point Presentation that includes
over 225 slides. After viewing this documentary, I presented Lou some
questions in regards to his fact-finding CD.
EC-When was the first
time you saw George Reeves and what did he do for you to become such a
loyal fan?
LK-
The first time I saw George was of course on the Superman TV
show, sometime around 1960-61, WPIX channel 11 in the Metropolitan New
York area. It didn’t register to me what his name was, he just seemed
like a really neat person. He made you feel like you were his good
friend. After watching a couple of episodes, I did want to know who he
was. I remember asking my father his name and he said “George Reeves.”
The words that followed had an unfamiliar meaning, which had a
mysterious tone to it. I was five years old and it was probably the
first time I’d heard of death. I never really found out how my father
knew who George was. Years later, after my own father passed away, did I
make the connection that they both served in the Army Air Corp. My Dad
must have seen George in one of those government films. Anyway, unlike
so many other fans of the show I never really had that feeling “of
Superman patrolling the skies” to keep me safe nor was in awe that I was
seeing the real Superman. I did, like so many others, run around the
house with a towel around my neck. In one visit to my Aunt’s house, I
remember trying to get her to tuck the towel into my shirt neck opening
like George’s, not tied around my neck with a knot in the front. So, she
employed safety pins to secure it into place. LOL. Once I connected a
name to this man, to me the real identity of this person was George
Reeves. And from reading the comic books George Reeves’ name was not
included in the stories. So, I knew there was a big difference between
the two. However, being there was a live version of Superman, he was in
my mind (in comparison to the comic books) the closest we would see a
Superman. This is just my opinion. There have been great actors that
played Superman, but George remains at the top. I admired the Superman
in the comic books, then most notably drawn by Curt Swan. But the two
were logistically different, but similar in some hinted ways. Of the two
versions, George Reeves won the part.
EC-When did you start
doing research on George Reeves to find out everything about him?
LK-
Research to me is defined by going out and talking to the people
involved. Like visiting places and discovering something unknown or
maybe confirming an issue. I was always searching for old newspapers and
articles to piece together facts about a life I wanted to know more
about. Then there’s learning which, is information obtained from the
research of others. Such as reading Gary Grossman’s book, Superman:
Serial to Cereal. A great title by the way. Learning new things from
Jan Alan Henderson’s Speeding Bullet: The Life and Bizarre Death of
George Reeves. Gosh, the Merrill Sparks insight was a real eye
opener. Why didn’t he come forward on June 17, 1959? I guess we will
never know.
I’ve spoken to Jack
Larson, Noel Neill, Robert Rockwell, Dabbs Greer, Jeff Corey, Keith
Thibodeaux, and Joanne Siegel, the wife of Jerry Siegel co-creator of
the Superman character. I’ve walked away with various bits of knowledge
from each of them. In doing so, I got to understand George Reeves the
person, a little better with each conversation. I’ve also been inside
the house that was once occupied by George. I discovered the correct
location of the master bedroom. In all the writings and TV segments to
that point, it never made sense to me as it was described above the
garage and finally I was able to satisfy my own curiosity (it’s above
the living room). As a result I made it highly known to everyone
interested what was correct. I eventually created a layout of the house
for the TAC site to help satisfy the extremely curious fan base and give
future authors and producers a reference.
In addition, a number of
times I went to college libraries, other than the ones I attended and
found they had years and years of newspapers saved on microfiche. I gathered a
lot of articles relative to George’s untimely death. As a result of
gathering this information. I’ve been able to step back in time to read
first hand the chain of events as it occurred. Now while not everything
you read is the truth, it takes a lot of time cross-referencing with
folks with this interest to sort out what is or isn’t logical. But just
because something doesn’t seem logical, that doesn’t mean it’s not the
truth. Truth comes in all forms.
EC-What made you
decide to do “Saving George Reeves” and what was your intention while
making it?
LK- It
has really been about the fans getting as much on George as possible. I
realized after several years of collecting and reading everything and
anything published, I realized I had a lot of photos and articles that
by 2002 were never before published. Initially, the material was meant
for The Adventures Continue #17. Because of the Internet and less
than moderate sales of #16, Jim had announced this would be the last
issue. I hoped to convince him to do another. What I had to offer would
have easily filled up an entire issue. When I showed a number of these
items to Jim Nolt, he even took a moment to give it some consideration.
By 2001, the TAC web site was now six or seven years old and many
more people were turning to the Internet for their George Reeves and
Superman interest. So with the TAC fanzine no longer a viable
channel, I decided to do my own thing. While a book would be the
ultimate tribute, I felt the quickest way to reach the fans was to
create a presentation using the Power Point program. I also felt while
it’s great to read about George’s life in various modern day
biographies. I think the fans get more out of this interest by reading
first hand those rare and hard to find articles that were used as resources.
For example, we’ve read that George appeared in Winged Victory in
1943 and one or two points of information is told. Then I found this
really extraordinary article titled G.I. Greasepaint which I
felt the fans would love to read. It has a lot of information and
wonderful photos with George and his wife Ellanora and their experience
together in this Moss Hart production. I figured if I could gather a lot
of what I thought was unique and make it available the fans would have a
greater appreciation for the subject. Superman’s Girl Friday is
another article which features Phyllis Coates. Many fans had heard of
it, but not many have actually read this extensive article. Another wonderful article is Super Heart in
its entirety. George visits Nati Vacio at his school. I’ve scanned
entire pages, so the fans get to see it exactly as it was printed. It’s
satisfying to everyone interested. As a result, the collector doesn't
have to do a long, exhausting search around the country any more.
EC-How long did it
take for you to complete the “Saving George Reeves” CDs?
LK- Both CD
presentations took about four months to complete. But remember, it took
me years and years to collect all the material contained therein. Since
the second CD presentation, I’ve been fortunate to obtain many more
great items. Heck, 98% of my purchases on eBay are George Reeves
related. As for a third CD, I have no plans to do another one. Like
Jim’s assessment of issue 16 of TAC, it doesn’t lend itself to
another go at it. I think what the readers are looking for is a book.
I’d love to do one, and I have a great idea. I spoke to several people
about it and they are absolutely excited by the idea. But again, there
are no solid plans at this time nor am I pursuing a publisher. The CDs
are like a sampler, speaking for themselves and if someone wants to
partner up for a book, I’m listening.
EC-Now with the days
of the internet finding photographs is somewhat easier. When you started
collecting, how were you able to find some of these rare and
hard-to-find photographs? Are these original movie stills?
LK- I started just
asking around local memorabilia stores and collectable shows. My first
four photos were of the following: Superman shaking hands with the
police officer, Superman standing in the freezer (from The Big Freeze),
Superman turning towards the camera with the cape bellowed out to the
right and one of George Reeves accepting an award from a man. In the
last photo, I described George is wearing a traditional dark suit. It’s
obviously from the extreme late 50’s since he is wearing his
prescription eyeglasses and his hair in thinning. The first three photos
would soon turn out to be common, but they are original. Regarding the
award photo, something told me I’d better not overlook this. It turned
out be a photo I’ve never seen again and therefore I feel very
fortunate I made the right selection over a couple of others which I
didn’t buy. I paid thirty dollars for each, which in 1984 was a lot of
money. Considering what was available back then, it was very
little so well worth it.
EC-Many of these
photos are more personal pictures of George with family and friends.
Were you surprised that some people were selling these items?
LK- Not really,
because a lot of people want to make a couple of dollars or trade to
improve their own collections. I’ll never obtain anything without a
fair exchange. For the most part everyone I’ve come in contact with,
have been great. Unfortunately, I did get hustled a couple of times in
the past due to being good natured. But I have no regrets. You win some,
you lose some. Nowadays I'm safe-guarding more of my material to
protect the overall collection for a mightier project.
EC-What do you
consider some of the highlights that you presented on your “Saving
George Reeves” CD?
LK- I'm very proud of an
original The Monroe Doctrine photo. It's really a one-of-a-kind
black and white photo, but the negative was hand tinted in color. The
final result is a gorgeous color print. Also, I became familiar with
George's other work outside of Superman from Gary's Superman: Serial
to Cereal book. When I found the Monroe Doctrine photo, this
kicked off my real interest. It made me realize there is a whole
other side of George to explore, with so much more to learn. That's one
of the benefits of the Saving George Reeves CD, it's packed
with many wonderful photos of George both in and beyond Superman. I
think it appeals to both those interested in his full career and as well
as the Superman years. Personally, I don't limit
myself to just the wonderful Superman years. If you feel there is magic
in his Superman performances, you'll find the same beyond the red cape.
By the way, I found the Monroe Doctrine photo in a store on
Hollywood Boulevard in June of 1991. It was the last store I went into
after coming up empty with several others while looking for
George-Superman photos. Someone must have came and cleaned that whole
boulevard out! I’ve only seen it again when it appeared in Jan Alan
Henderson and Steve Randisi’s book Behind the Crimson Cape in a
black and white version. I know Jan's actual photo is black and white.
So what I have is unique. Another highlight photo is George in the cast
photo from Variety Girl. Believe it or not, I found this while
searching through a vendor’s magazine box at an outside vintage car show
in Pennsylvania. I try to leave no stone unturned, even in odd places
like a car show. I also found an incredible 1942 magazine article
on Jerry Siegel and Joe Shuster that day. The Variety Girl cast
photo is probably the only known image of George known to exist from
that film. Fans were hard-pressed to spot him in the film itself. I suspect he is
at the end when many of the performers walk across the screen. He’s seen
at best very faintly in the background.
There are so many
highlights on the CDs it really is difficult to not discuss them all,
but obviously this interview would take a lot longer! When
I released the CDs, 95% of the items were unique to anything
published. Today it still holds up very well, though a little bit here and
there has cropped up.
I’m proud to present many of those extremely rare articles to
give the fans hours of reading enjoyment. And again, the fan
response has been great.
EC-I also see you go
into detail with other actors/addresses that appeared with George in the
movies and television. Did you also look into some of their movie
careers?
LK- I thought it
would be interesting to acknowledge whom George worked with. It's meant
to keep it interesting. Regarding The Monroe Doctrine photo,
there you'll find Nanette Fabray. It was only when I referred to imdb.com
did it become aware she was the woman in the photo. I was really surprised
and excited about it when I learned of it.
EC-You included
numerous articles from movies and newspapers about George Reeves from
his early years. Even with the internet, I had a tough time finding the
newspaper articles to read about George, especially at the time of his
death. How were you able to obtain them?
LK- As I mentioned
before, I found many of the newspaper articles on microfiche at a local
college. Because the printing from these machines are very substandard, I
retyped them word for word as they were originally printed. There are
about twenty New York and Los Angeles articles to read in there. Since
then I've come across a couple of originals. One I have is an entire
June 24, 1959 Los Angeles newspaper with George and the
unfortunate headline story. Many other magazine articles were from eBay
purchases. I also found some through collectable shows and stores. It
takes a lot of patience to go through boxes and boxes of magazines, but
it is well worth it. Then again going by the rule of not to leave any
stone unturned, when you least expect it to happen something wonderful
pops up. The thrill of the find is amazing. For example, there is an
image of George with a little girl on his shoulders at the opening of
Disneyland. It is a three by four inch photo, difficult to spot unless
you look at each and every photo. There it stood alone in the
celebrity’s tidbit section of the magazine. It’s great to find some of
these treasures and share them with other fans. I’m still trying to nail
down an image of George in a NY newspaper between August and September
1958.
EC-Were you amazed on
how much work George did prior to playing the role of Clark
Kent/Superman?
LK-When
you look at his career on a whole, he really didn't do a lot of lounging
around. He had a really good career. Remember he was in many Pasadena
Playhouse stage shows, which kept him busy too, even during his
theatrical years. Granted, his theatrical film work can't be compared to
John Wayne's or Gary Grant's, but he had some marvelous performances
throughout his career. So Proudly We Hail is one prime example. I
want to mention that Claudette Colbert was searching through audition
after audition for her leading man. As she was sitting in the
projection room and looked at screen tests of many young men, George’s
audition was there by mistake. When Claudette saw his face, she shouted,
“Stop, that’s the man!” This article is in the CD presentation. Soon
Jungle Goddess and Thunder in the Pines will be released by
Kit Parker. They aren't Academy Award films by any stretch, but fun
films to watch.
EC-What movies did
you enjoy seeing him in?
 LK-Always
a Bride, Man At Large and BAR20 are big favorites. I'd love
to see Kit get his hands on them for DVD release. Always a Bride
is just extraordinary. George out-besting John Eldredge for the loving
hand of Priscilla Lane. It's a real hoot. George is at his charming
best. I've said this before, I think George was one of the very best
leading romance actors in the business. When he looked into a woman's
eyes he never wandered off. She is his only interest. This could be a
good lesson for the guys...it’s what women want. Oh, and interesting to note, Always a
Bride was released sometime near the date George and Ellanora were
married in December 1940.
EC-What was the most
difficult task you had in trying to complete your project?
LK- I can’t say I had
any. I pretty much knew what I wanted to do. I guess it was the grueling effort to retype the newspaper
articles. Also, cleaning up some minor water stains from the vintage
articles.
EC-When doing your
research were you able to denounce a number of rumors that have been
going around for years about George to be false?
LK- As a rule,
I try not to speculate on any one issue unless I have two or three
pieces of information that go with it. It was told Don Brewer had
introduced himself to George backstage of Winged Victory in Chicago.
This story probably started by someone after hearing only a small detail
of the event and assuming how point A got to point B. George was
rejected by Don Brewer in 1943 during Winged Victory. While true
on that level, the embellished meeting backstage is untrue. I found out George learned of his natural father while
staying with a cousin. When George got to
Chicago with Ellanora he phoned Don Brewer living in the Mid-West.
During their conversation, Don rejected a relationship with George. Based on what I
learned, I speculated the logical reason was that Don did not want to
rock the boat with his current wife, a headstrong woman, by introducing
George into the family. My speculation was confirmed by a family member
as accurate. George would have been 29 at the time and he was very
disturbed by this moment. Gosh, who wouldn’t?
Then again, we can't
always believe everything we read. I have the article where it states
George refers to his confrontation with the 8 year old boy aiming his
fathers gun at him. We've come to learn that this was not true. But then
again, we hear from other people writing on message boards that lived in
the Detroit area that seem to recall hearing about this episode in 1954.
EC-Were there any
other people who were able to assist you so you could give fans the most
accurate information on George Reeves?
LK- I talk to
people all the time. For years I have communicated with Jim Nolt, Randy
Garrett, Jan Alan Henderson, and Steve Randisi. I have also spoken to
Carl Glass. He is in catch-up mode, and making great progress, I will
say. He has a great interest and boundless energy as we discuss George
at great length. As a result of our conversations, we are exchanging
information, thoughts and confirming details for each other. Deciphering
what makes logical sense and what doesn’t, and does it hold any value?
So I’m sure what we’ve learned from each other has made it into the CD
presentations. Certainly just about everyone I know has recognition of
inspiration somewhere in there.
EC-I noticed there
were a lot of photographs contained in your CD, but there was also a few
drawings done by Randy Garrett, illustrator for the Superman and the
Secret Planet comic book (which can be seen at
www.jimnolt.com). Were any of
these drawings his idea to add to your CD or yours?
LK- First let me say
this, the world is a far better place with Randy Garrett in it. He has
made so many people from all over the world happy with his rendition of
Superman & the Secret Planet. I consider Randy one of my greatest
friendships and I'm flat out his biggest fan, bar-none. That's a mighty
tall statement considering how well admired he is by The
Adventures of Superman community (LOL). He is an ace of a guy. His
generosity is rarely matched. Just look at Superman & the Secret
Planet and other work he has done on the TAC website.
The two illustrations
Randy did for me were ideas of my own, inspired from something else. His
skills as an illustrator can catch lightning in a bottle as far as I'm
concerned. It’s amazing to have the talent to layout and pencil an
illustration, but look close at the inking. His embellishes and
colorings are just so wonderfully rendered. He is a complete craftsman.
He recreated the cover of Superman #16 with the likeness of Noel and
George. This image has traveled around in my head ever since I laid eyes
on that issue. (Which, by the way, I own an original copy.) The other
image is of George revisiting the Mole Men in 1953. The image came to me
when I saw the film Toy Story. Do you remember the scene where
Buzz Lightyear falls into the game occupied by little green people?
Right then, I saw George and the Mole Men. I gave Randy the idea and he
did a tremendous job. Then again when doesn't he do a great job? The TAC
web-site, 16 issues of the fanzine and the two calendars he and Jim
produced are graced with tons of his wonderful illustrations. No one could have done what Randy unselfishly has done. He
illustrated Noel and George in the Nash-Healy for me to perfection. I
gave him a very rough sketch, a little written text detail of how I
envisioned Noel and George and the imagination became a reality. As far as I'm concerned
he is a great part of the extended history of the Adventures of
Superman. You can’t give a history lesson on this show without
including Randy’s Secret Planet.
EC-Now that the movie
“Hollywoodland” came out, do you think there will be new or renewed
interest on the life and times of George Reeves?
LK- Oh sure. Look at the
prices Speeding Bullet and Hollywood Kryptonite were
selling for on eBay recently. Speeding Bullet got over two
hundred dollars. It is really amazing how people are racing to read this
subject. Thankfully, Jan decided to print a second updated version to
answer the demand. Both Carl Glass of Glass House Presents and I have
seen a rise in the interest in e-mails alone. I responded to probably a
hundred e-mails in September because of Hollywoodland. It was
exhausting. Tracking on Readyhost.com, both TAC and GHP
saw a huge spike in hits during September ‘06. To help with my
responses, I wrote Flight of the Innocent, my Hollywoodland
- historical counter-essay. It made it a lot easier to communicate
overall. I think it helped Carl too. He and I pretty much agree a lot on
this subject. While the essay helps with the abundance of the topic, I
still enjoy a focused e-mail discussion on any of the issues. There are
so many great people out there that have had this interest for so long
and many new people are writing all the time with fond memories of
George and the rest of the Adventures of Superman cast.
George
left an everlasting positive effect on his fans. Something the newspaper
media fails to understand. They don’t see George has a caring following
and regardless of the true circumstances of his death, we admire him just
the same because we believe the way he treated people as equals, the
things he did in life to help others, and his career are fascinating
traits. If idolizing him for raising hundreds of thousands of dollars, a
tremendous amount of money in those days, visiting children in cancer
wards with no agenda for publicity means we are hero worshipping, well
then so be it...I’m guilty as charged. He is my hero, not for saving
Lois Lane and Jimmy Olsen 104 times, but
for living up to the same qualities that Superman a hero. We know he couldn't
save the world in real life, but he did his part. A positive role
model? Absolutely. I see the real man and so do many others. These are
good qualities to admire. As Mr. Larson has said, “George gave away
more money to out-of-work actors than was ever paid back to him.” George
was admired greatly in his time and still is today. Just ask, Bette Shayne,
Stephanie Shayne, Fred Crane, Dabbs Greer. In real life, he did have faults,
but I believe these lapses are very much over-embellished and treated
like he was the only one who ever lifted a martini glass. It was the times and the place.
It’s funny. If you
characterize George as nothing but being a good man, you’ll be
labeled a "blind hero worshipping fan boy." Reflect on his social
drinking, female relationships and you will fall into the
clutches of idolizing a selfish bum.
For example, George has been defined as a
“womanizer.” Has any woman ever come forward as a jilted lover?
Not that I’ve ever heard of. So “womanizer” seems a little
harsh. I was sitting in the Kenneth Hahn Hall
on July 10, 2001 next to Joanne Siegel her daughter Laura Siegel-Larson
(both very nice people). We attended the 50th Anniversary of
the 1951 filming of the Superman TV show. While chatting, she told me of
a story of meeting George before she was married and long before he
became Superman. She was working in a Los Angeles nightclub and he
introduced himself, asked her what time she got off work and would she
be interested in going out dancing? She said they went out together and
he was wonderfully charming and every bit the gentlemen. Her story is
also told recently in the Feb. 2006 magazine issue of Alter Ego, by Roy
Thomas.
Then we have Toni
Mannix, ten years older, married to a man herself almost fifteen years
her senior. The long-term relationship between George and Toni was an
open-secret within the Hollywood community. No sneaking around, no
hiding, and accepted by Mr. Mannix. I once believed the relationship
between Eddie and Toni was closer to a father-daughter relationship. It
seemed the only logical explanation. But as Mr. Larson recently cast
light on the subject for me. George had explained to him that Eddie and
Toni had an “arrangement.” Eddie had his girlfriends as many studio
executives did in those days and eventually he fell in love with a woman
of Japanese culture. If you understand how Eddie and Toni met, when she
met George, when Eddie and Toni married, the committing to each other,
but allowing each other secondary relationships and they being strong
devout Catholics who do not believe in divorce, it becomes more clear
how this worked.
In the 40’s,
George had tried the "all-American traditional marriage" with Ellanora.
They were married for approximately eight years and unfortunately it didn't work out. Ellanora was his true love.
While they tried, they weren't
successful in producing a child of their own. I have a strong belief
George was sterile. This may be one reason why their marriage didn't
succeed. George, as we know, was a
sensitive and considerate man and may not have wanted to face disappointing
another woman wanting to start a family. As for Toni or Leonore, I doubt George saw either as
candidates for motherhood. Thus, he found a safe haven from a
possible disappointing situation. We also know from Alejandro Vacio, Nati (his lifelong best friend) and Queta's son that George would have
loved a child of his own. Wanting to be part of a family, George asked
Alejandro to call him “Uncle Jorge.”
EC-Is there any other
project you might be interested in or like seeing in the future as it
pertains to allowing fans to know more about George Reeves?
LK- Can we expect to see more? First, I want to say any
well-done book on George is always great. There have been some really
great books out there over the years. Most recently, Peter Murano’s The George Reeves Adventures of
Superman Companion Book which was a wonderful surprise. Jan
Alan Henderson, Steve Randisi and Mike Bifulco Behind The Crimson
Cape: The Cinema of George Reeves was great to read and backed with
amazing photos. I was happy to be a small contributor to that, as well
as Jan’s second edition to Speeding Bullet. Larry Ward’s
second edition of Truth, Justice and the American Way: The Life and
Times of Noel Neill, The Original Lois Lane was another bright spot
this year. And everyone got into the spotlight in that one. I
don’t want to leave out Mike Bifulco’s Tenth Anniversary Edition of
Superman on Television and Spaceman Lost. These are all very
tough acts to follow. I know each of these individuals and I know the
hard work each put into these projects. Hopefully, there’s more to come.
Where does that leave
Saving George Reeves? Since the second CD was finished, I have
more than enough material to do a third release. But another CD presentation
doesn’t interest me. My dream is to put something in the hands of the
reader who can plop down on the couch or relax for several hours in the
backyard. As opposed to sitting at the computer monitor for which all
our spouses complain we spend too much time in front of anyway (LOL).
I’d like to take the best articles and features from the hardcopy TAC
fanzine issues and expand upon it with the many items I’ve assembled in
the CD presentations and the many items bought since then. In all, it
would be a tremendous volume which would be unique to everything that’s
been done before and anything anyone I know is considering of their own.
Basically it would be titled: The Best of The Adventures Continue
with George Reeves. A lot of fans missed out on those fanzine
issues. It would be a tribute to George Reeves in the tradition of TAC
along with a large number of surprises. I presented the
idea to Jim Nolt, who loves it. I have mentioned it to others who also think
the idea is exciting. Now please understand, this is not by any means an
official announcement. It’s a dream. One I’d love to see come true.
Basically it’s a matter of printing cost. Something neither Jim Nolt nor
I have. But I am starting to save for it. Anyway, Eddie I hope I
answered your questions.
I just wanted to
say thanks to Lou for taking the time out to answer some questions for
us in regards to his “Saving George Reeves” CD. As good as the internet
is, there is still a lot of misinformation out there and with this CD
Lou not only gives fans something to enjoy, but also gives us an
accurate account of this actor who has generated legions of fans and
shows us another side of the man in the crimson cape. Thanks Lou for
giving us a true Hollywoodland story.
You can purchase Lou Koza’s “Saving
George Reeves” CD by going online to
www.jimnolt.com
In addition, when you purchase Lou’s CD,
Lou will donate a portion of the sale to the Myasthenia Gravis
Foundation where George served as the National Chairman.
December 2006
FANS LINE UP TO SEE
THE ORIGINAL LOIS LANE
NOEL NEILL
AT CHILLER THEATRE IN
NEW JERSEY
By
Eddie Caro
At the Chiller Theatre show in East Rutherford, New
Jersey, I witnessed fans line up to see the sweetheart of America’s
favorite superhero. Fans old and new crowded Conference Room A of the
Sheraton Hotel to see the original Lois Lane, Noel Neill. There were
other comic book artists and television actors/actresses nearby, but
fans lined up to see Noel. They were there to hear her stories and/or
have a picture taken with the icon they watched time and time again.
They watched her get saved by Superman, who was played by the
unforgettable George Reeves, the one who many consider their favorite
Man of Steel.
When you entered the
conference room you immediately saw a big picture of George Reeves
dressed as Superman with Noel together in a publicity shot which had
been taken years ago. Alongside this picture was a poster stating in
bold letters that Noel Neill is the Original Lois Lane. Then, standing
by the table, as big as life, was Ms. Noel Neill. She was there waiting
to greet you with a warm smile and wearing a blue shirt with that famous
“S” symbol on it. Displayed on her table were various pictures of her in
different episodes of The Adventures of Superman, along with other
motion pictures including the two Superman serials she appeared in.
As the fans came to see
her, I saw that many were middle-aged men and women approaching her with
wide smiles. Some came to have pictures signed that they had
previously taken with Ms. Neill, their favorite television reporter. As
they approached her, they had a gleam in their eye. As they greeted Ms.
Neill, many fans told her that The Adventures of Superman television
series was their show while growing up and how it impacted in their
life. As the younger generation came to see Ms. Neill, some were
surprised to find out that Christopher Reeve was not the first one to
don that famous crimson cape. They learned that there were others that
flew through the skies of Metropolis on the big screen and television
before they were born.
As fans were coming in
many of them stated that they drove for miles not to see the other
thirty plus actors/actresses/comic book artists in attendance at
Chiller, but to see only one person, Ms. Noel Neill. Fans were telling
her stories about how they used to rush home after school so they could
see The Adventures of Superman on television. They proudly admitted
that years later they continued to see the show whenever it aired on
television.
I saw many adults
leading their children and grandchildren to the room and telling them
that this was the person they grew up with and watched for so many years
on television. They also told stated that George and Noel were their
Superman and Lois Lane, and there is no one that could ever replace them
in their heart.
In addition to having a
personalized autograph picture(s) of Ms. Neill, She gladly posed with
fans and had her picture taken over and over again. I watched adults
feel like children again as they took a picture with her. They thanked
her for giving them memories they can share with their children and
grandchildren. They also told stories of how they felt as a kid waiting
for George to change to that famous costume that so many of us have
duplicated in our own unique way. There was one individual who was so
excited that he finally had the chance to meet Ms. Neill that he almost
forgot his autographed picture that she signed for him. He told her that
he waited years for this opportunity to come, and he was not going to
miss it for the world. He left with a tear in his eye saying that her
show meant so much to him. He thanked her over and over again, as did
many other fans, for giving them memories they would never forgot.
As I left her room and
walked the hallway, I heard people saying that Ms. Neill was as sweet in
person as she was on television and how happy they were to finally meet
her. As Hollywood has not yet placed a star in her name on the Walk of
Fame, she will forever be a star to us. She and the rest of the cast
members of The Adventures of Superman will continue to give us thrills
and adventures for years to come. There are not many shows on today that
can say that. Fans are also anxious to see Ms. Neill in Season 2 of
The Adventures of Superman on DVD, which will be on sale on January 17,
2006. They will then be able to relive the thrilling Adventures of
Superman starring their favorite Lois Lane, Noel Neill.
December 2005
 AN
INTERVIEW WITH GLENN WHITMORE
DC COMIC BOOK COLORIST
By Eddie Caro
When you buy a
comic book these days, you look at who the book was about, who wrote the
story, and who the artist is. Recently, the comic book colorists seem to
be getting as much attention as the comic book writer and/or artist
themselves. Comic book colorists have finally come out from under the
spotlight and are now given credit for making the comic book artist’s
sketches stand out even more. I recently had a chance to meet DC Comic
Book Colorist Glenn Whitmore. Glenn worked on several Superman comic
book titles, which include the historic issue where our beloved Man of
Steel succumb to injuries suffered to him by Doomsday. This changed the
course of Superman history. I recently was at a comic book show where
Glenn was in attendance. He was a personable gentleman and answered any
and all questions given to him by fellow comic book fans. Glenn was
kind enough to answer questions given to him by me about his time at DC
Comics and other work he is currently involved in.
Eddie Caro-How
long where you a colorist for DC Comics and what comic book issues did
you work on?
Glenn
Whitmore-I
freelanced as a colorist at DC for ten years, 10 of those under
contract. My first
assignment was Hawk & Dove mini-series (drawn by Rob Liefeld) during the
summer of '88. Later that year, editor Mike Carlin offered me the
Superman books, and I began on Superman (#27) and Adventures Of Superman
(#450). I was still on board when Action Comics relaunched (remember
Action Comics Weekly?) a year later, and a few years after that,
Superman: Man Of Steel. I worked on every regular issue until about
1999-2000. I also colored a "run" on the Flash in the early'90's, as
well as Justice Society (drawn by the late, great Mike Parobeck),
Justice League Task Force, and Power Of Shazam.
EC-Did
you do any other work besides colorist on any other comic book issues?
GW -I
penciled a cover image for Justice League Of America Archives #3 (inked
by Dick Giordano). My own self-published Captain Clockwork debuted in
Big Bang Comics (#31) which I wrote/drew/inked/lettered. In ‘02, I
penciled and inked a Dr. Stellar story for Big Bang's World Class Comics
Special, penciled a "Blitz" chapter for a Big Bang summer special
('03?), and drew various spot illustrations for them along the way.
EC-If
you had a choice to pick any assignment to work on a comic book what
would your choice be and why?
GW-Anything
drawn by my favorite artists (Steve Rude, Darwyn Cooke among them) would
be my dream assignment to color. I would have loved to color something
on the level of DC: The New Frontier. Also, anything with the JSA would
be great to color as well.
EC-Was
there any artist, inker, or colorist you wanted to meet while you were
employed by DC Comics?
GW-It
was a big thrill to meet Jerry Ordway when I first broke in. I wanted to
meet Alex Toth, but he's a recluse. Meeting Steve Rude at Chicago Wizard
con 2000 and seeing one of his sketchbooks was a near-religious
experience. I do regret not meeting Mike Parobeck before he passed in
the mid '90s.
EC-Were
you able to keep any pieces of art that you worked on at DC Comics?
GW-I
received nearly ALL of my originals (xeroxed black and white pages with
water colored specs and notations) back from the separator. They are all
stored in boxes on a shelf in my garage. I even have a few color "keys"
(color printouts with separate plates for cyan, magenta, yellow, black)
for some covers I did.
EC-It
seems like the comic book writers and artists have been getting all the
attention, but recently colorists seem to be getting their due. It was
said by some comic book fans that Guy Major’s color work has enhanced
John Bryne’s artwork in the current series of Action Comics. Do you
think that colorists now may be getting the attention that in the past
have been given to comic book artists or writers?
GW-Colorists
ARE getting more attention on the higher profile assignments, even
getting billing on the cover along with the writers and artists. Over
the past ten years, I've seen the role of colorist become more important
and I don't see this as an entirely good thing. To me, modern artists
are relying on the colorist TOO much to make sense of their images with
over rendering and computer effects. Don't get me wrong. The computer is
the
best thing to happen to comic book coloring since comics started. But I
feel that it doesn't mean that pencilers and inkers can shift the
responsibility for good page design, spotting blacks, and effective
storytelling. Okay: end of rant.
EC-When
DC Comics hired you to be the colorist for the Superman comic book
series were you aware that you would be contributing to a historical
event in Superman comics?
GW-When
I first became Superman colorist, I was unaware of any "planned events"
for the future. The engagement may have been in the works, but the
"death of" certainly wasn't. I was present at a Super-team summit when
the "death of" storyline was seriously suggested. As a joke, I would
annually suggest Superman Red, Superman Blue. The rest of the team would
always laugh. One year, I didn't make it to the summit. Later, when I
glanced at the plot grids from that summit, there it was: "Superman Red,
Superman Blue". So I guess, you have me to credit/blame for that.
EC-Knowing
that comic book and non-comic book fans from all over the world would
read Superman issue #75 in which Superman dies, were you nervous about
the results?
GW-I
was generally kept very busy, and I really didn't have time to dwell on
the importance. When the "death of" storyline was first suggested, to
me, it was just another great storyline to hook the readers. The
DC/Warner publicity and marketing departments did a stellar job in
making the whole event a success. It took me, and probably the others,
by surprise.
EC-Did
any media outlets in regards to your work on the death of Superman
series interview you?
GW-I
was not interviewed by the media specifically on the Death Of Superman.
Shortly after his return, I was interviewed on a Collector's show on the
local cable access channel. On it, I covered various topics, and touched
on the subject of Superman's death and return. The show was replayed ad
infinitum for about a year and one or two strangers even recognized me.
Not exactly Glennmania, but still very cool. I think I have a copy
floating around here somewhere.
EC-As
you were growing up in Morris County, New Jersey do you remember how you
were first exposed to the world of DC or Marvel comics?
GW-In
the early '70s, I was first exposed to Batman and Superman through
re-runs of their respective TV shows. Around the same time Channel 5 in
New York ran the Filmation Batman, Aquaman, and Justice League cartoons
every afternoon. It was there that I got hooked on the DC universe.
EC-What
type of schooling or training did you receive to become an
artist/colorist?
GW- I
attended the Joe Kubert School in Dover, NJ which was 15 minutes from my house. Upon
graduation, I worked for the Morristown Daily Record that colored its
DAILY comics page. A fellow staff artist suggested I take my pages to DC
to try and get some color work. Over the next several months, I took my
samples to Bob Rozakis (production manager) and learned the ins and outs
of color guides and color codes.
EC-In
the year 2000 a comic book character you called Captain Clockwork
debuted in the Big Bang Comics #31 published by Image. Can you tell us
how you came up with the idea of this new comic book superhero?
GW- For
the longest time, I had vague and pointless ideas for long term series'
involving a time traveling hero in which I could not interest
publishers. At some point, I decided short stories with a focus (and to
please myself) would be more productive and get my points across more
effectively. Also, I had four different designs for Clockwork and I
couldn't decide which to use. I figured out a way to use all four in
these shorter stories taking place along history. I try to create
stories in which the hero has to make crucial, tough decisions. Making
tough decisions is something everyday people can relate to.
EC -Are
you working on any projects now?
GW- My
only current project is to complete enough Clockwork stories to
self-publish a series which I hope to publish in '06 (when I turn 40).
I'm also open to any additional coloring assignments (like Steve Rude's
The Moth) which I recently colored. I'm looking forward to the Moth
series starting up again soon.
EC-Will
you be making any appearances in the near future at any comic book shows
so fans can meet you?
GW- As
of now, I have no planned appearances. I'm always open to making local
appearances and hope to do so soon. I'm hoping to add some bigger shows
in the future when my book is finally published.
EC-Now
that Warner Brothers is finally releasing the “Adventures of Superman”
on DVD will you be getting a copy?
GW- I
just bought this yesterday and I'm 4 episodes into it. I LOVE IT!!!!
I'll be submitting a review as soon I can.
I wish to again
thank Glenn Whitmore for taking the time to answer questions about
himself and his work on Superman along with submitting these pictures
for all of us to see. Be on the lookout for seeing more of his work on
Captain Clockwork and The Moth coming in 2006. If you wish to find out
more about Glenn Whitmore’s artwork or order an issue of Captain
Clockwork visit
www.captainclockwork.com and see one of the up and coming comic book
artists/colorists in the industry.
December 2005
OFFICIAL REVIEWS OF
THE ADVENTURES OF SUPERMAN
SEASON ONE DVD SET
By Eddie Caro
When Warner
Brothers finally released the Adventures of Superman Season One
on DVD, I wanted to hear from some fellow fans about what they thought
of the job Warner Brothers did. Many people had some questions about
the DVD set. I hope these reviews will help us decide if Warner Brothers
did a good job when releasing this series. More reviews from fellow
George Reeves Historians to follow.
Jan Alan Henderson
 On
October 18, I opened my mailbox, and there was The Adventures of
Superman five DVD box set. Eddie Caro has asked me to share some of
my thoughts, so here they are:
Fifty-four years after the final frame
of The Adventures of Superman was put into the can, we have one
of the most comprehensive documentation on everyone’s favorite series.
And oh, what a joy it is to relive those bygone days in Metropolis,
which in reality was Los Angeles.
The
episodes are crisp, and the supplemental material gives Superman fans
young and old something to explore. There are some flaws, but after all
of these years they should be easy to compensate for. The special
features add to the presentation and packaging. Enjoy!
Mister X
 Many
people, myself included, are no doubt tempted to criticize the Warner's
release of TAOS Season 1. It certainly could have been better.
Well, it can always be better. In all modesty, I think I did a
better job in some ways than Warner. It helps to be a pirate, no legal
obstacles. And of course, as far as Warner is concerned, this is first
and foremost a commercial venture. They're in it to make money, and no
doubt they entered into this project with some trepidation, wondering if
they'd sell enough to make back their investment. Well, the rapid
announcement of the release of Season 2 obviously answers that question!
I think people should remember that when
TAOS was released on videotape by Columbia House how expensive it
was. Twenty dollars a tape for 20 tapes containing a total of 60
episodes! Time and technology has changed all that! Today's price is
certainly right!
The menus and general layout of the DVDs
are a disappointment. The music is dreary, and the menus are not easily
navigated. There are no chapters within each episode, which further
impedes navigation. The sound bites used in the menus are totally
unrelated. I think Warner could have done better. They should have hired
Randy Garrett!
All the episodes have the identical
opening sequence, which is ok, except they didn't use the one from "The
Haunted Lighthouse", which was unique.
The printing on the discs themselves is
fabulous! But, the packaging is tricky. Unless one takes real care,
discs can be easily scratched.
Precious little was done to restore the
audio, which is replete with background noise, which could have been
easily fixed. A case in point: In "The Unknown People Part II, Superman
asks that Luke Benson and his mob "stop acting like Nazi storm
troopers". Its a seminal moment in the series, and the sound track is
damaged, the final syllable of storm troopers, the final "s", is
clipped. There's a break in the audio. If you compare it with the discs
I've created, you'll notice the difference. I fixed it, took all of ten
minutes.
Listen closely to the pitch of the
voices in the final scene of Superman On Earth. This has been off
pitch in virtually every version I've ever seen. They took a stab at
fixing it, but not a good one.
The episodes were obviously digitized
from 16-millimeter prints, which explains their graininess. Compare them
with Pony Express Days, which is surely 35-millimeter. To briefly
explain the difference, the larger the frame, the greater the
resolution, and the less grain when its enlarged, just as the more
pixels in a digital photograph, the better it looks enlarged. Motion
picture film frames are in a 4x3 ratio, so a 16mm frame is 192 square
millimeters, and a 35mm frame is 918.75sqmm, nearly 5x greater area. I
was hoping that Warner made new master prints from the original
negatives, but they chose not to do so. Perhaps they no longer exist, or
they've deteriorated beyond repair, or it was economically unfeasible to
do so.
Other obvious things are the lack of
previews, and the missing emblematic theme music that Warner apparently
wouldn't pay royalties to use, hence the dreary music used in the menus,
and it probably explains the missing previews too.
The extras are hit and miss. I enjoyed
Pony Express Days and Inkwell to Backlot. Gary Grossman
was good, if inaccurate in spots. I would have much preferred the
comments of Jack Larson or Jim Nolt to those of Chuck Harter, who seemed
rather lethargic in his narration.
But, all in all, it’s still a great
achievement, and I'm certainly not disappointed. 1953 promises to be
even better. I would certainly think that any TAOS fan would be
delighted with these DVDs. I know I am.
Lou Koza
I've
been reading some of the comments regarding The Adventures of
Superman DVD box set and I can't say you guys are all that much
wrong. Although I think overall it is a great box set, hopefully we see
improvements with the forthcoming sets.
Kellogg's commercials:
A wonderful example to give fans who've never seen these before.
Pony
Express Days:
Extraordinary print. Seeing George riding with guns blaring is
absolutely out of this world. A great choice by Warner's to include this
short feature. Let's hope for more. A++
Gary Grossman Commentaries:
Fun, informative, Ex: Excellent description of the sets used for other
films. The opening intro building is the Mutual of Omaha Bldg, not LA
City Hall. Inaccuracies, Ex: In The Stolen Costume, Gary
identified Geta Van Borg or Connie as she is known in the episode as
"Alice." In The Haunted Lighthouse, Gary perceived a spliced
scene as switching a stunt man for George. At that exact moment of the
splice, I'm absolutely certain without a shadow of doubt it was George
during both sides of the split. And I'm also absolutely certain it was
the bad guy that was switched out for a dummy going over the edge. In
The Stolen Costume, Mr. Grossman mentions that Superman comics can
be seen on the racks behind a man selling newspapers on the street
corner. I always thought it was well known that the series helped sell
the Man of Steel's comic book's and visa versa with ads and cast bio's
on the comic books. A missed opportunity to mention this. Otherwise
Gary's enthusiasm and back to being a little boy helped improve his
grade to an A-.
Chuck Harter Commentaries:
No offense, but I feel Chuck was ill prepared for this effort. Whether
it was his fault or perhaps Warners gave him no advanced notice and he
just winged it. I say this because he seemed to repeat several thought
ideas more than once. For example: 1) "Here George looks good" is stated
three four times and 2) the fact the show aimed at adults as well as
children is stated three times in two of his episode commentaries. In
addition, I felt there were a number of missed opportunities to reflect
on important subjects, for example: 1) No mention of the music, narrator
or effects that went into the classic intro. If the expert is weak in
the music and effects department, I could understand, but at least
mention who voiced the opening narration. 2) During The Evil Three,
there was no background given for either Rhys Williams or Jonathan Hale
who is best known to TV Superman fans as Professor Roberts in
perhaps THE most classic episode Panic in the Sky.
In addition, Mr. Hale is best known to a broader film enthusiast as Mr.
Dithers, the boss of Dagwood in the Blondie series. 3) With the ghost of
Taylor looking in the window, here it should have been identified and
discussed that this is the first scene that sent kids running for their
Mommy and Daddy and due to an outcry from parents caused
Kellogg's to have this and
several other scenes edited from this episode. Later, when Elsa is
pushed down the ramp, Mr. Harter finally makes note of scene edits. Side
note: It is often described by many that Elsa is pushed down stairs.
This is not the case, since it is a ramp and her decline is proven by
her smooth transaction and during two other scenes with Perry and Jimmy
as they walk down. Unlike stairs that would have a person bobbing up and
down during the decent. In Crime Wave, there is no mention that
the scenes during Superman's final push to eliminate crime in Metropolis
montage is completely overlooked for more discussions that the show is
not entirely aimed at children buy also for adults. Perhaps this was a
good time to discuss it, but why repeat it. The entire show is a good
example of it and the season being aimed at adults. The first time
should be enough to make the point. Maybe something all together could
have been discussed during this period. I also could do without the deep
voice "BAM", "BOOM" sound effects Mr. Harter was making during a
particular scene. And on a final note, Mr. Harter has for years stated
George and Elvis look alike. Personally, I don't see the resemblance,
nor the reason to bring it up. C+
I want to give both credit for their participation and the benefit of
the doubt that perhaps the logistics of the commentaries gave no
advanced notice of which episodes Mr. Grossman and Mr. Harter would be
working on, therefore both may have worked without guideline notations.
This is the first run, we all learn from our mistakes and perhaps
they'll do better next time if given the opportunity.
Box Graphics: All around,
fantastic work inside and out. The text, the DVD graphics, images all
look absolutely wonderful. One could argue there should be no excuse for
some episode description mix ups. Personally, I'm willing to overlook
it. A
Box Configuration Design:
I like many do not like the overlapping discs. But I do like the easy in
and out disc access center push button. B
From Inkwell to Backlot:
Fun to watch. Jack is great to see. B
Episode Picture Quality:
Simply outstanding, even with the "as is" condition of The Stolen
Costume. After all, isn't this what we fans are really looking
for? This is the premier feature of the entire box set. The showcase of
the box set that stands entirely on its own with or without the extras.
A+++
Major Disappointment: The
excuse Warner gave recently in a NY newspaper article prior to the DVD
box set release was that they did not have all the Previews and
therefore did not include the small number they do have is no excuse.
They included three of many Kellogg's commercials known to exist. So why
not a sample of the Previews? Warner at the very least should
have included what they have. If not having all of them was an obstacle,
for the better of the majority, this could have been easily remedied
with any well known number of contacts. Personally, I have them all, I
know people who have them all. The losers are the many fans out there
that are not privy to our network of enthusiast and most likely seeing
the Previews for the first time would sure be an extraordinary
treat. Aside from that, the Previews belong with this season
regardless if they were not part of the original Maxwell 35mm prints
Summary: I guess we as
fans have high standards for our favorite television star, Mr. George
Reeves. Possibly, because of the high standards by which he worked by.
And therefore we should expect nothing but the best effort from a
company such as Warner Brothers. Despite some of the shortcomings, there
is an abundance to enjoy and I'm certain future installments are going
to be great too.
Carl Glass
 On
October 18th, 2005, the day of waiting was over for the
devoted fans of this classic TV series The Adventures of Superman
The complete first season. Admittedly, I was not on this bandwagon for
the many months of anticipation. However, being one of “George Reeves”
kids and reading the initial responses on various boards on the
Internet, the suspense was overwhelming and I made my purchase that day.
The Packaging:
George Reeves, with fists on
hips, planet orbs, stars in background, and Superman logo above in a
colorized uniform of red, blue, and yellow from the standard gray and
brown of the '51 season was truly impressive. On the backside,
Allan Asherman, the DC comic historian gives a good historical
synopsis of what to expect from the 5-Disc set (although the synopsis on
the inside is out of order – Episodes 14, 15 & 16). The layout, with the
special features included sparked my interest, especially the short I
had longed to see for many years, Pony Express Days.
After opening the
package to see the display, I found the laser cover application to each
disc very appealing, however, the overlapping of discs would present a
challenge. Before removing these discs, you must remind yourself that
you are a skilled surgeon. Many of you reading this know exactly what I
mean.
Episode
Quality:
In reading comments
before this release, many have been concerned over the kind of prints to
be worked from. Would they be from 16mm prints or 35mm? Experts have
informed us that episode 13, The Stolen Costume would be
most difficult to restore because the original print no longer exists or
was badly damaged. Well, as for the quality of that episode, they are
right, but the story overcomes all that. I must admit that I am not
astute in these matters and leave that to the experts, but I will say
that I am not disappointed with what I’ve seen thus far appreciating the
visual clarity for what it is. The menu selection is formatted in a
comic book page form, believing it is an attempt to be clever and
entertaining. It serves its purpose.
Pony Express
Days:
My hat goes off to Warners
for doing a remarkable job with restoring this outstanding 19-minute
short with George Reeves as the humble, yet enthusiastic, young “Bill
Cody.” I understand this was restored from a 35mm fine grain negative.
You’ll love George’s riding and shooting skills! George saves the day
and the Union.
Special
Features: Gary Grossman and
Chuck Harter were featured guests on 4 key episodes, The Haunted
Lighthouse, The Stolen Costume, The Evil Three, and Crime
Wave.
The most crucial
element in these commentaries is not a style of enthusiasm versus a
lackluster performance, but accuracy. Never having done a commentary,
and would not understand the pressures that might go with it, many
inaccuracies are evident, I choose to make a negative into a positive.
I have been challenged by both Grossman and Harter to do some research
into information.
Harter’s
over-emotional descriptions and assessments are a waste of valuable
time. Both commentators alluded to the Daily Planet building in
the ‘51 episodes to be that of City Hall in Los Angeles. It is in fact
The Mutual of Omaha Building. They both were informative
about the film noir aspect to the series concerning light, shadow,
backdrops, special and cinematic effects for that time period, giving
props to a crew who had experience in B film working with time
and budget constraints. Both fail to mention the stock music library
known as the “Capitol Cue Package.”
You could say I’m
somewhat picayunish when it comes to statements like “When children
watched this scene or episodes back in 1951,” or the reference of an
episode listed in “TV Guide” of that same year. The show was released
in small markets in ’52, and then across the nation in ‘53. George
Reeves was 37 years old in 1951, not 38.
I have always been
fascinated with the character support actors on TAOS. It was my
hope that in The Evil Three, that Mr. Harter would divulge
in the careers of Jonathan Hale, Cecil Elliott, and
Rhys Williams. I was challenged, learning that Jonathan Hale had
appeared in over 200 films, but I remember him well as Mr. Dithers
on the Blondie movie series from the 1940’s. He was not
mentioned for being Professor Roberts in Panic In
The Sky.
Cecil Elliot
had more than just theatrical experience. She began her film debut in
Secret of The Chateau (1934), and made film
appearances throughout the 1930’s. Ms. Elliot made appearances in many
films and television throughout the next three decades including
The Killing (1956), The Reluctant Astronaut
(1967), and 1974’s Chinatown.
Rhys Williams:
had a notable face on film beginning with How Green Was My Valley
in 1941. With over eighty motion picture appearances, Williams was
also popular on the small screen with roles in Bonanza,
Maverick, 77 Sunset Strip, and so many others.
His career spans from 1941 until his death in 1969.
“Private Eye Candy
Meyers” played by Frank Jenks also appeared in the 1954
TAOS episode The Magic Necklace, as “Lazy.”
Gary Grossman, at the end of his commentary on The Stolen Costume,
was just about ready to inform us as to whether or not this episode was
from the radio show but time expired from the commentary. The fact is,
Stolen Costume and all the first season
shows except Molemen had their basis in radio because
Robert Maxwell and his wife Jessica produced
the radio show for a decade. The character “Candy Meyers”
originated on the radio, as was “Inspector Henderson.”
Chuck Harter comments that the Warner Brothers print is longer than the
Kellogg’s print in Crime Wave. This is simply not so!
There is more George and the cast in the Kellogg’s version. He also gets
the amount of cuts in The Evil Three wrong.
I enjoyed immensely
the From Inkwell To Backlot feature, with jazz music in
the background. It had a nice touch, and it was insightful to hear
commentary from Jack Larson and the others.
Now that you have these DVD’s in your possession, let me remind you of
one fact. There was a time when we had nothing! Enjoy! Thanks Warner
Brothers! “A little bit of something is better than a whole lot of
nothing!”
I wish to thank all the above contributing
reviewers for taking the time to share their thoughts with us. If it
wasn’t for the fans to keep George Reeves memories alive, we might not
have a DVD set to review.
November 2005
THE MEN WHO FOUND
THE MAN
BEHIND THE
CRIMSON CAPE
By Eddie Caro
I am sure
many people like myself who saw George Reeves for the very first time
saw him when he appeared in the Adventures of Superman television
series. As I grew older and watched movies and television shows over the
years, I never saw George Reeves in any other role. This made me believe
he was just here for all of us to enjoy in being our Superman. I would
later see him in the beginning scenes of the classic film Gone with
the Wind, but did not see him in any other motion pictures.
Years ago, when I purchased the book Superman on Television
written by Michael Bifulco, it gave me a detailed synopsis of the
television episodes he did while playing Superman. This again made me
think he only appeared as the Man of Steel. As I looked for more George
Reeves material I did not have much luck finding information about him.
Mind you, this is before the Internet. Searching bookstores and
libraries gave very limited information on George Reeves. My guess is
that people only saw him as Superman, and nobody wanted to take the time
to research him. They were probably thinking again that they only knew
him for leaping out of windows when trouble arises. When I discovered
the website The Adventures Continue, I found out that
George Reeves had done a series of motion pictures, and various people
did in fact gathered personal information about him. Seeing this, I was
curious again to see the man before he became Superman.
While visiting the site, I found out that two men who are also friends
and fellow writers of various entertainment magazines gave us a total
look of the motion picture career of George Reeves, the man before he
donned the crimson cape. Steve Randisi and Jan Alan Henderson, who are
both avid admirers of George Reeves, gives fans a look at the man they
admired for so long. Both Jan and Steve took time out of their busy
schedules to answer few questions about their book so fans can see the
man before he became Superman.

EC: Both of you have previous writing experience with articles that
appeared in different entertainment magazines. Jan, you yourself wrote a
book titled Speeding Bullet: The Life and Bizarre Death
of George Reeves. Whose idea was it to start a book titled Behind
The Crimson Cape?
 JAH:
Steve's. We were in Metropolis, Illinois, when he proposed the idea to
me. The hot summer nights and all the activities kept the excitement
level high. I was very lucky that someone brought along a guitar, and
allowed me to play for most of the visit. I believe Steve mentioned it
one morning after a very long night. At that particular point, Michael Bifulco also mentioned to me his idea, which eventually became
Spaceman Lost, which is an extremely entertaining and well-written
book. Even though it is a fictionalized account, it is probably much
more sensitive to the memory of George Reeves than some other projects
have been in the past, and most likely other projects will be in the
future. When Steve pitched what we now know as Behind the Crimson
Cape, I was resistant to the idea because of the fact that in my
opinion a goodly amount of filmographies are written as intellectual
manifestos by authors with superiority complexes and way too much time
spent at college. I told him that I would remain open to the idea, but
we needed some "hooks." I can be a real pain when it comes to this
stuff, and that goes for any of my other writing in my 18-year career,
because I believe that if I'm going to leave something behind, hopefully
it will entertain as well as educate, and not treat the readers as
second class citizens.
 SR:
True, it was basically my idea, but the concept was born out of
conversations I had with several people in Metropolis. I was there with
Jan in June of 2000 and we had many talks with some of the locals. While
all these folks are tremendous Superman fans, very few are what you
could call dedicated Reeves aficionado. That is, most of them didn't
know anything about George's career except for the TV series. They knew
that his first big break was in Gone with the Wind and that was
about it. But what about the Cagney pictures, the Hoppy series, or
classics like Blood and Sand; So Proudly We Hail; Blue
Gardenia; and all those great "B" films at Warners, and the
smaller studios? We thought George's screen work warranted further
analysis and recognition.
EC: When
you had to obtain research material was the Internet any help to either
of you in regards to writing this book, or did you find that sources
were limited?
JAH: I
can't answer for Steve or Mike, but I have a severe mistrust of the
information provided by Internet sources. While it can be a thumbnail,
or an outline if you prefer, for whatever you might care to do with it,
it is generally riddled with inaccuracies and is feeble. When I look at
Internet Movieline Database, it almost makes me want to lobby for a job
correcting all the zingers. I was very lucky I came under the influence
of five people in the print business: George Turner, who edited
American Cinematographer Magazine, who along with his partner
Michael H. Price originated and wrote the Forgotten Horrors
series; Mike Stein of FilmFax magazine; Mike Copner, the
creator/editor/publisher of Cult Movies Magazine (and look for
Issue #41 in the fall); and last but not least, my good friend and
partner in crime, Mike Bifulco. These five individuals, through example
and discussion, have hopefully taught me how to do this gig. To bluntly
answer your question, these guys are the creme de la creme of
researchers. Maybe a little rubbed off.
SR:
The internet was somewhat helpful, but certainly not integral to doing
this book.
EC: How
long did it take for both of you to complete Behind The Crimson Cape?
JAH: Five
years. Written in bits and pieces and on the fly in spare time, or time
one does not have to spare.
SR:
Yes, it took five years. However, all of the work in the fifth year was
done by Jan and Mike. They worked very hard to lay the material out
until it became the book that you hold in your hands today. These guys
had been through this before and they knew exactly what they were doing.
Obviously, they are pros and did an excellent job!
EC:
Steve, you live on the East Coast, and Jan, you live on the West Coast.
The publisher Michael Bifulco resides in Michigan. Did this cause any
problems when trying to produce this book? Since you could not see each
other to discuss topics, did this put added pressure on all of you to
get this project done?
JAH:
Doing a project, whether it be a book, album, or film, is a highly
pressurized situation. Most people don't have clear ideas going into
these things, which is why these movies cost millions. These
independent guys with their digicams who actually try to figure it out,
make more interesting products than so-called Hollywood Studios. Doing
a book is the same thing. I was watching the Actors Studio the other
day and saw George Carlin, who as usual was tremendously funny. He made
a statement that we are now unleashing technology to cure the ills of
the past technology. So from my standpoint, not being able to meet with
the other members of the team, it was incredibly difficult, but when it
worked it was great. Example: Some of the photographs were not
reproduced on the disks I sent Michael Bifulco of the book. By using a
scanner and emailing Michael the missing photos, we got a far better
result than any of us thought possible. The whole thing is a
trade-off. We were lucky we had a team that thought on its feet.
SR:
The distance really didn't present any problems. I enjoyed sending Jan
material; then looking forward to receiving feedback in the mail. That's
why I really don't think the internet was what that important in the
process.
EC: The
book summary states that you have over 300 illustrations of George
Reeves from different aspects of his movie career. Were these photos
from your personal collections?
JAH: Yes.
SR:
Yes
EC: Since
you had such a large collection of illustrations of photos of George for
your book, what made you decide to have a sketch done of him for the
cover instead of adding one of the many pictures at your disposal? Who
is the artist that did the cover for you?
JAH: The
art work was done by a dear friend of more decades than either of us
will admit, named Larry Byrd. He was responsible for the artwork and
editing of the Graveyard Examiner column in the massively popular
Famous Monsters of Filmland. He had also contributed to
Fantastic Monsters of the Films, and has done album covers for me. The
reason we didn't use a photo is because we had already tread that ground
twice. Adding Larry to the team was one of my provisos for doing this
gig. The idea was—don't hit 'em with the same thing three times. Our
good friend Randy Garrett also has done what I consider brilliant
renderings of George.
SR:
About the covers. We wanted to do something a bit different from what's
been done in the past. I love artwork. If you look at all the classic
movie posters from the so-called Golden Age of Hollywood, almost all of
them employ fabulous artwork and graphics. And when Jan said he wanted
to use Larry Byrd for the job, I was thrilled because I was already a
fan of Larry's work from a magazine back in the 1970s called Pratfall.
When I saw the drawings that he created for our book, I nearly flipped!
EC: A lot
of fans know George Reeves just as Superman, due to the popularity of
the Adventures of Superman television series. This book shows he
had appeared in many motion pictures prior to donning the crimson cape.
Some of these movies like Samson & Delilah and Gone
with the Wind are classics and are shown every so often on cable
television. Then there are others, like short films such as the Last
Will and Testament of Tom Smith and The Monroe Doctrine.
Was it difficult to obtain some of these movies since they don’t appear
regularly on cable television if ever?
JAH:
Immensely, and immensely expensive. What people don't realize is that
to produce this type of work and present it as we have presented it,
ain't cheap. If someone were to ask me if I thought they should pursue
a career in writing these types of materials, I would tell them no
unless you're a millionaire. None of the team are even thousandaires.
People were doing things like selling certain Reeves films of which you
speak at the wonderfully affordable price of $250 for a VHS cassette.
This is where I had to put my foot down. I found other ways to obtain
the synopsis and review materials. The bill for the photographs was
astronomical.
SR:
It was very time consuming and expensive. Some titles were obviously
more difficult to obtain than others. It was sort of like a big Easter
Egg hunt.
EC: Both
of you stated in your book that when George was in the military he had
done many training films during the Second World War. Do you know how
many he did and if you were able to find any to see for yourself? If so,
how was his acting back then? Was he destined for greatness or a diamond
in the rough?
JAH:
George's acting was always consistent due to his theatrical background.
George's world, in my opinion, was most comfortable when he was acting.
Like any true artist, the problem for artists is life gets in the way.
We did come across one film that is commonly sold through magazines and
at collectors shows, which is pretty nauseating. Not George's part—the
subject of the film! There are other clips in various documentaries,
especially a snippet with George and future Superman guest star/Batman
serial star Robert Lowery. We didn't see that entire film. I'd venture
a guess these films do exist somewhere in the government film vaults, if
they haven't all turned to vinegar.
SR:
How was George's acting? I think George was a tremendously gifted actor;
he was disciplined and totally believable in everything he did.
Unfortunately, he was—and still is—under-rated as an actor, and that's
another reason why we wanted to do this book. You can't determine if a
performer is "destined for greatness" based on Army training films.
Those little films were just fly-by-night things that actors did back
then. It is hard to say exactly how many of them he did. Perhaps more
reels will turn up someday. Wouldn't it be wonderful to locate a "lost"
George Reeves film?
EC: When
you started watching these motion pictures of George Reeves to do your
book, did you see them in a different light, since you were writing a
review about each and every picture he ever appeared in? When preparing
to write for a book about someone you care about, did you notice scenes
that you had not seen before?
JAH: The
question is double sided. Did I notice any scenes I hadn't seen? Yes.
Did I reconfirm any of my opinions when I watched all these movies
before I did Speeding Bullet and edited them down for space? The
answer is yes. I noticed more about the production values reviewing the
films for Behind the Crimson Cape, and what sort of working
situations George was in.
SR:
When you watch a film over and over, yes, you do notice little things
that eluded you the first time around. What really amazed me was the
scope of George's talent, especially in films like Always a Bride.
EC: When
you were watching George play different roles in his movies from Police
Captain in Blue Gardenia, a night club owner in Lydia to a
host of other characters, which one could you see George do on a regular
basis besides that of a mild mannered reporter?
JAH: The
police captain in Blue Gardenia. There was talk of him doing
Dick Tracy after Superman, as his co-star Ralph Byrd (Thunder
in the Pines and Jungle Goddess) had died in 1952 from a
heart ailment.
SR:
I'll go along with Jan about George as Captain Haynes in Blue
Gardenia. His only other role that could have developed into a
regular assignment would have been the character he played in Jungle
Goddess. Although I like to see George in diversified roles, I like
him better when he's not playing a "heavy" or villain, as in Rancho
Notorious or The Mutineers. Now George as a comic-villain
(i.e., The Good Humor Man) is a different story. I think George
was capable of being very funny. To be a good comedian, one must be a
good actor. And George certainly was that!
EC: You
also give the readers a lot of valuable information in the book about
some of the people who starred with George in the various movies. Was
getting their information difficult to obtain like Sidney Blackmeer’s
list of credits when he starred with George in The Monroe Doctrine?
JAH: Not
if you know where to look!
SR:
All the credit must go to Jan on this angle.
EC:
Michael Price of the Fort Worth Business Press stated that you compiled
an exhaustive catalogue of Reeves’ movie assignments. He states your
book deals in concise historical and aesthetic discussions in addition
to just the fact details. Was that one of your purposes when deciding to
write Behind The Crimson Cape?
JAH:
Michael Price is far too kind. But yes, that was my intention.
SR:
Yes, Mr. Price was very generous with his words. I do not know him, but
I thank him for his highly positive review.
Note:
If you wish to see the article Michael Price wrote about Behind The
Crimson Cape visit his site at
http://tinyurl.com/bo9x6
EC: On
the back of the Behind The Crimson Cape dust cover there are
tributes from Noel Neill and Jack Larson. They state that this is a book
George would have wished for and it is a long overdue tribute to a
gentle man. Were they able to assist you in anyway in the development of
your book?
JAH:
Their friendship and kindness over many decades was one of the reasons
that Michael and Steve and I tackled this project. There can be no
greater inspirations.
Credit must also be given to Dr. Don Rhoden
and Jim Nolt, for starting this whole thing off by creating The
Adventures Continue. Their assistance was crucial to the
development of Behind the Crimson Cape.
SR:
Jack and Noel have been an inspiration most of my life. They are
wonderful people.
EC: If
George Reeves was still with us today what do you think his reaction
would be to a book totally and completely dedicated to him?
JAH: He
probably would have whacked me on the head with his cane for writing
Speeding Bullet! Then chase me around a tree! I hope he would have
liked Behind the Crimson Cape, and I hope he would have sat me
down and pointed out all the other mistakes I haven't found yet, and
made me post them on the internet!
SR:
I would hope that George would give us a "thumbs up." We tried to pay
tribute to him and I hope we succeeded in doing just that.
EC:
Warner Brothers recently announced the release of the Adventures of
Superman coming soon to DVD. Do you think with the impending
release of Season One will there be renewed interest in the life of
George Reeves?
JAH:
To a limited degree. When you or any of your readers go to the mall and
mention the name of George Reeves to people between the ages of 18 and
34, I would wager most people think he was the guy in the wheelchair,
who is as we know, Christopher Reeve. One would hope this would
rejuvenate the interest, but let's face it—they are taking more and more
of this type of entertainment off our cable boxes. Classic TV will soon
be ruled by 70's and 80's fodder, which is great if you're into that
kind of stuff. But that's probably and hopefully the reason they are
coming out on DVD. I've also seen this audience for this show ebb and
flow. One minute there's 200 people who are interested, and the next
minute there's maybe 2,000. It's wise never to predict what an audience
will do.
SR:
Jan has already put it quite succinctly.
EC: Can
we expect another book from the team of Henderson and Randisi in the
future on anything related to the entertainment field?
JAH: We
are in the process, the team that is, of trying to sell the book. We
are attempting to address the concerns of the here and the now of the
marketplace, and no discussions have been undertaken on this subject as
of yet. Remember, the book has only been out for a month or so.
There hasn't been time in any of the other team members lives for
anything other than promotion of the book.
I think it is phenomenal that the amount of
people who remember George Reeves, and that's why we did this book.
|